{"id":11393,"date":"2022-08-02T14:38:25","date_gmt":"2022-08-02T14:38:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2022\/08\/02\/roku-has-a-problem-its-buttons-arent-printing-enough-money\/"},"modified":"2022-08-02T14:38:26","modified_gmt":"2022-08-02T14:38:26","slug":"roku-has-a-problem-its-buttons-arent-printing-enough-money","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2022\/08\/02\/roku-has-a-problem-its-buttons-arent-printing-enough-money\/","title":{"rendered":"Roku has a problem \u2014 its buttons aren\u2019t printing enough money"},"content":{"rendered":"

Source: https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2022\/8\/1\/23283008\/roku-button-revenue-earnings-q2-2022<\/a>
\n
<\/br><\/code><\/p>\n

\n

No, you didn’t suddenly forget how to read: Roku, the streaming box and service company, is worried about how much money its buttons are bringing in. Not because it suddenly started making clicky actuators for other companies to include in their products (what a pivot that would be), but because Roku\u2019s really an advertising company in streamer\u2019s clothing<\/a>. And it absolutely has prime real estate to sell to streaming services: for a fee, it\u2019ll plaster their logos onto buttons that customers will likely see every time they use a Roku. Even better, those buttons will only<\/em> launch that service. <\/p>\n

Basically, Roku\u2019s best ROI may be the Netflix-red and Disney-blue paint its suppliers buy.<\/p>\n

Near the bottom of each Roku remote, you\u2019ll see four buttons labeled with a variety of streaming services \u2014 currently, Roku\u2019s website shows Netflix, Disney Plus, Apple TV Plus, and Paramount Plus. That\u2019s an absolute plethora of pluses, though the buttons change over time as new streaming services are born<\/a>, die<\/a>, or make different decisions about where to spend their ad budgets. (I like to imagine that someone once received the worst remote ever, only featuring buttons for streaming services they never use like Sling, Rdio, PlayStation Vue, and Quobo. Points if you can guess which one of those is made up<\/a> without googling.)<\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\"\"<\/p>\n

<\/source><\/picture>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Sorry if you wanted buttons that everyone would use.<\/em><\/figcaption>Image: Roku<\/cite><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n

Roku\u2019s certainly not the only company<\/a> that relies on \u201cbutton revenue,\u201d but it really pushes these buttons hard; on its simple remote<\/a> these shortcuts make up literally a quarter<\/em> of all the buttons, even if you\u2019re very generous and count the D-pad as four separate inputs. That ratio doesn\u2019t change all that much when you move up to its Voice Remote or Voice Remote Pro, either. It\u2019s easy to see why Roku makes the buttons so prominent; in 2019 Bloomberg<\/em> reported<\/a> that streaming services paid about $1 per customer to put their button on the remote. If that number is still accurate, that means Roku could be making up to $4 per remote, just from streaming service fees. Multiply that across most of the 63 million active accounts Roku reported in its Q2 2022 earnings (pdf)<\/a>, and that\u2019s a big chunk of change.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re Roku, that\u2019s a stroke of genius; each time you sell a remote, you get money from whoever\u2019s buying it and<\/em> from four streaming services. Limiting it to four slots on most models is also smart \u2014 last I checked, there were way more streaming services<\/a> than that who would love to have a button on Roku\u2019s remote. If there\u2019s one thing I learned from my economics classes (aka the great GPU scalping wars<\/a> of \u201820 and \u201821), low supply plus high demand equals cash in the bank. Roku can basically print money, as long as it keeps selling devices and remotes, and convincing advertisers to keep paying the same amount for their own special buttons.<\/p>\n

\n