{"id":12092,"date":"2022-08-11T14:43:27","date_gmt":"2022-08-11T14:43:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2022\/08\/11\/google-search-will-stop-telling-you-when-snoopy-assassinated-abe-lincoln\/"},"modified":"2022-08-11T14:43:28","modified_gmt":"2022-08-11T14:43:28","slug":"google-search-will-stop-telling-you-when-snoopy-assassinated-abe-lincoln","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2022\/08\/11\/google-search-will-stop-telling-you-when-snoopy-assassinated-abe-lincoln\/","title":{"rendered":"Google Search will stop telling you when Snoopy assassinated Abe Lincoln"},"content":{"rendered":"

Source: https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2022\/8\/11\/23300668\/google-search-featured-snippets-update-false-premises-consensus-results<\/a>
\n
<\/br><\/code><\/p>\n

\n

The team behind Google Search is tweaking its featured snippets \u2014 the text boxes that sometimes spread false information while trying to offer help<\/a>. The company announced an update<\/a> that\u2019s supposed to make answers more accurate and avoid the problem of false premises, or questions where no definitive-sounding answer would make sense. It\u2019s paired with an expansion in Google\u2019s \u201cabout this result\u201d option and warnings for low-quality data voids<\/a>, as well as a new partnership on information literacy lesson plans for middle and high-school students.<\/p>\n

Snippets appear under many searches, but because they appear to directly answer questions by quoting pages, they can backfire in ways<\/a> that standard query responses don\u2019t. In a presentation to reporters, Google offered some examples of these problems and how it\u2019s trying to fix them. When you search for how long light takes to get from the Sun to Earth, for instance, Google at one point offered a snippet that highlighted the distance from Pluto instead.<\/p>\n

The solution, according to Search VP Pandu Nayak, lies in finding consensus: facts that match across multiple top search results. In a call with reporters, Nayak clarified that this consensus check is sourced from pages Google has already designated as high-quality, something Google hopes can avoid a snippet equivalent of Google bombing<\/a>. \u201cIt doesn\u2019t establish something is trustworthy, it just looks around the top results,\u201d says Nayak. But by looking at several pages that Google already trusts, then trying to find commonalities, it hopes it can avoid highlighting the wrong details.<\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\"A<\/p>\n

<\/source><\/picture>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

A warning on a Google search for \u201chow to get in touch with the Illuminati.\u201d<\/figcaption>Google<\/cite><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n

A separate problem is the \u201cfalse premise\u201d issue, a phenomenon where Google tries to be a little too <\/em>helpful with snippets. For years, if you\u2019ve entered a leading question about something that never happened, Google has frequently offered snippets that seem to confirm its factuality, drawing out-of-context text fragments from a semi-related page. The Search team\u2019s example, for instance, is \u201cWhen did Snoopy assassinate Abraham Lincoln,\u201d which at one point offered the date of Lincoln\u2019s death in a snippet. Google calls these cases \u201cnot very common,\u201d but it says it\u2019s been training its systems to get better at detecting them and not offering a featured snippet at all, and it promises it\u2019s reduced the incidence of these inappropriate appearances by 40 percent.<\/p>\n

\n