wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source: https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2022\/8\/23\/23318545\/illinois-snapchat-biometric-privacy-lawsuit-settlement-facebook-location-tracking<\/a> Snapchat users in Illinois who used filters or lenses may be eligible for a payout. Illinois reached a $35 million settlement with Snap this month, according to the Chicago Tribune<\/em><\/a>, in a class action lawsuit over how user data was collected.<\/p>\n The suit alleges that Snapchat\u2019s filters and lenses violated the state\u2019s Biometric Information Privacy Act<\/a> (BIPA) by collecting and storing biometric data without users\u2019 consent. Illinois has some of the most stringent laws<\/a> when it comes to companies collecting residents\u2019 biometric information, including fingerprints, iris and retina scans, and face scans. The state law requires companies to tell people in writing why their biometric data is being collected and how long it will be kept and prohibits the sale and transfer of the data. <\/p>\n Illinois residents who used lenses and filters between November 17th, 2015, and now may be eligible for a cut of the settlement, estimated to be between $58 and $117, according to the Chicago Tribune<\/em>. The settlement still needs final approval, but users who think they may be eligible have until September 24th to submit a claim here<\/a>. <\/p>\n Snap denies that it violated BIPA, and Snap spokesperson Pete Boogaard says Snapchat lenses \u201cdo not collect biometric data that can be used to identify a specific person, or engage in facial identification.\u201d Boogaard adds that data used by lenses stays on a user\u2019s mobile device and isn\u2019t sent to Snap\u2019s servers.<\/p>\n \u201cWhile we are confident that Lenses do not violate BIPA, out of an abundance of caution and as a testament to our commitment to user privacy, earlier this year we rolled out an in-app consent notice for Snapchatters in Illinois,\u201d Boogaard says.<\/p>\n This isn\u2019t the first time Illinois residents have sued platforms for biometric data collection. A different case, in which TikTok is accused of breaking Illinois law<\/a>, also progressed this week when a judge granted final approval of a $92 million settlement. In June, Google agreed to pay out $100 million<\/a> over a face grouping feature in Google Photos, which allegedly violated BIPA. In 2021, Facebook agreed to pay $650 million<\/a> to settle a similar BIPA class action lawsuit.<\/p>\n Separately, Meta reached a $37.5 million settlement<\/a> this week, in which the tech giant is accused of violating California law and user privacy through location tracking. Facebook users allege the company used their IP addresses to target ads even after users disabled location services, according to Reuters<\/em><\/a>. Meta declined to comment on the case. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
<\/br><\/code><\/p>\n