{"id":13949,"date":"2022-09-07T14:46:37","date_gmt":"2022-09-07T14:46:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2022\/09\/07\/samsung-galaxy-watch-5-pro-review-sometimes-bigger-is-better\/"},"modified":"2022-09-07T14:46:39","modified_gmt":"2022-09-07T14:46:39","slug":"samsung-galaxy-watch-5-pro-review-sometimes-bigger-is-better","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2022\/09\/07\/samsung-galaxy-watch-5-pro-review-sometimes-bigger-is-better\/","title":{"rendered":"Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro review: sometimes bigger is better"},"content":{"rendered":"

Source: https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/23340822\/samsung-galaxy-watch-5-pro-review-smartwatch-wear-os-3<\/a>
\n
<\/br><\/code><\/p>\n

\n

I didn\u2019t think I was going to like the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro. First came the rumors that this watch would be a behemoth<\/a>. Then came the whispers suggesting Samsung had murdered its darling<\/a>: the physical rotating bezel. Finally, leaked renders<\/a> indicated that this watch was not only big but a heckin\u2019 chonker. If Samsung assembled a team to annoy the crap out of me, Victoria Song, specifically, this is the watch they would\u2019ve come up with. And yet, the $449.99 Pro I ought to despise has pleasantly surprised me several times over the past few weeks.<\/p>\n

I know, I\u2019m shocked, too.<\/p>\n

\n