Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wp-plugin-hostgator domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the ol-scrapes domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893
{"id":13949,"date":"2022-09-07T14:46:37","date_gmt":"2022-09-07T14:46:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2022\/09\/07\/samsung-galaxy-watch-5-pro-review-sometimes-bigger-is-better\/"},"modified":"2022-09-07T14:46:39","modified_gmt":"2022-09-07T14:46:39","slug":"samsung-galaxy-watch-5-pro-review-sometimes-bigger-is-better","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2022\/09\/07\/samsung-galaxy-watch-5-pro-review-sometimes-bigger-is-better\/","title":{"rendered":"Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro review: sometimes bigger is better"},"content":{"rendered":"

Source: https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/23340822\/samsung-galaxy-watch-5-pro-review-smartwatch-wear-os-3<\/a>
\n
<\/br><\/code><\/p>\n

\n

I didn\u2019t think I was going to like the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro. First came the rumors that this watch would be a behemoth<\/a>. Then came the whispers suggesting Samsung had murdered its darling<\/a>: the physical rotating bezel. Finally, leaked renders<\/a> indicated that this watch was not only big but a heckin\u2019 chonker. If Samsung assembled a team to annoy the crap out of me, Victoria Song, specifically, this is the watch they would\u2019ve come up with. And yet, the $449.99 Pro I ought to despise has pleasantly surprised me several times over the past few weeks.<\/p>\n

I know, I\u2019m shocked, too.<\/p>\n

\n