wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source:https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2022\/04\/23\/if-everything-is-the-metaverse-then-the-metaverse-is-nothing\/<\/a><\/br> Welcome to The TechCrunch Exchange, a weekly startups-and-markets newsletter. It\u2019s inspired by the\u00a0<\/i>daily TechCrunch+ column<\/i><\/a>\u00a0where it gets its name.\u00a0<\/i>Want it in your inbox every Saturday? Sign up\u00a0<\/i>here<\/i><\/a>.\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n Happy Saturday! A few notes from the house before we get to work. TechCrunch\u2019s new crypto-focused podcast Chain Reaction<\/a> launched this week, which I am excited about. And, the TechCrunch+ team is hosting a Twitter space<\/a> Tuesday, April 26 with\u00a0Silicon Valley-based attorney and TechCrunch+ columnist Sophie Alcorn who will discuss immigration-related issues and answer questions relevant to startup founders and workers.<\/p>\n I think that\u2019s it. Now, to work!<\/p>\n Ever since Facebook decided to chart a new future toward the metaverse<\/a>, even changing its name to mark the shift, the term has become ubiquitous. Myriad startups and public companies are slathering themselves with the term in hopes of catching the wave.<\/p>\n I have no real beef with companies tuning their marketing for the current moment. What I do struggle with is just what the metaverse is<\/em>. For example, back in January this newsletter said the following<\/a>:<\/p>\n The most fun that I had this week was\u00a0a visit to Decentraland<\/a>. In short, I was in edit and trying to distract myself so that I wouldn\u2019t bother the editing team while they worked, so I fired up the social-crypto environment \u2013 metaverse, in other words \u2013 and went for a tour. Rocking a mohawk and some pretty cool pants I managed to get lost, visit an NFT gallery, and fail to gain access to an arena.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Is the metaverse a social-crypto environment, bringing together human interaction and decentralized ledgers? Perhaps that\u2019s part of it, but it doesn\u2019t feel sufficiently complete a definition.<\/p>\n The definitional nuance of the term came up this week in a piece that Jacquelyn Melinek wrote for TechCrunch+<\/a> on how artists both musical and visual are tapping into crypto products to connect with fans, and make money:<\/p>\n Meta<\/a>\u2018s version of the metaverse consists mainly of virtual reality or augmented reality for friends to interact with one another, while web3\u2019s take on the metaverse is more centered around how users will experience the internet in a digital world.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n What\u2019s good about this particular riff from Melinek is that she\u2019s correct. There\u00a0are<\/em> several definitions of what the metaverse is. This is the precise gray area that has allowed anyone working with digital communities, or really digital assets more generally, to claim the label. The result is that everything is the metaverse, which is the same thing as saying that precisely nothing is.<\/p>\n As Melinek notes, there are two main thrusts toward building the metaverse. The Meta approach appears to start from the perspective of personal representation inside a persistent, video-game like environment. This means that the \u2018metaverse\u2019 is akin to an MMORPG, but without a genre-specific quest focus; it\u2019s more open-ended, and thus more open to continued thematic expansion. The more crypto, or web3, approach is to consider digital assets that can be viewed as an extension of one\u2019s self as the metaverse, or at least part of it. A \u201cPFP NFT\u201d being, for example, how you want to display yourself in a digital environment. That sort of thing.<\/p>\n It\u2019s possible to imagine a hybridization of the two definitions. A place where you and I might have a persistent avatar of sorts and digital goods are recorded on some sort of decentralized ledger.<\/p>\n The issue with that vision is that it\u2019s not super possible to build at the moment. Why? Because there isn\u2019t a way to build an MMORPG atop the blockchain, and companies able to build such a platform don\u2019t want to allow for decentralized asset creation and management, as it would limit their ability to rip value out of their game<\/a>\u00a0or digital living environment.<\/p>\n Yes, this is tension between decentralized and centralized systems, but in this case it\u2019s a useful divide to note as it appears to be keeping what could be the metaverse from reach. It is not\u00a0too<\/em> hard to come up with a way forward. For example:<\/p>\n Is that a compelling metaverse? I guess at this juncture if that isn\u2019t<\/em> then we need to entirely rewrite what we mean when we say the word. Because that\u2019s as close as I can smush things together without literally dropping all current definitions and starting over from scratch.<\/p>\n Good luck, Facebook!<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n <\/br><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n
\nIf everything is the metaverse then the metaverse is nothing<\/br>
\n2023-01-20 22:52:54<\/br><\/p>\nDefining the metaverse<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n