wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source:https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2022\/04\/20\/top-nft-collections-are-bringing-in-millions-of-dollars-weekly-but-which-will-survive\/<\/a><\/br> The wild world<\/span> of NFTs has taken the crypto world by storm in the past 12 months, and while they\u2019re not loved by everyone, they\u2019ve caught most people\u2019s attention due to the sheer volume and number of projects popping up in the space.<\/p>\n The most popular NFTs are often the most valuable, too, with buyers spending hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars to buy an NFT\u2014 often tied to a community \u2014 that they can either hold onto or later trade for a profit (or loss). But how truly liquid is the blue-chip NFT<\/a> marketplace?<\/p>\n The top 50 blue-chip NFT collections have had multimillion-dollar sales in the past seven days, according to NFT data aggregator CryptoSlam<\/a>. During that time, the top 10 NFT collections alone brought in over $500 million worth of trades across 19,468 unique buyers, the data showed.<\/p>\n But many NFT holders said that this demand comes with inherent risk and market volatility, among other factors, which play a part in the future of these digital collectibles and their liquidity.<\/p>\n It\u2019s also worth noting the number of high-roller NFT buyers is typically smaller than the participants in the larger marketplace for NFTs, but PROOF Collective\u2019s new \u2014 and possibly blue-chip \u2014 Moonbirds<\/a> NFTs were officially minted on April 16 and accounted for the majority of the sales tracked by CryptoSlam over the last seven days, raking in $297 million across 10,813 buyers. (A mint is when a digital file is turned into an NFT or digital asset on a blockchain, usually Ethereum or Solana, and its information is permanently stored on the blockchain.)<\/p>\n Even with Moonbirds, on April 17, the day after its launch, there were over 10,000 buyers. But that number plummeted to just 296 on April 19, CryptoSlam data<\/a> showed. The floor price, which is the lowest amount of money you could spend for the digital collectible in the collection, also fell around 16% in the past 24 hours.<\/p>\n \u201cThe problem is when prices are going down, it goes fast,\u201d Nick O\u2019Neill, CEO and co-founder of The Nifty<\/a>, said to TechCrunch. \u201cThat\u2019s especially the case in NFTs. When people start getting concerned, prices can move dramatically.\u201d<\/p>\n One of the most popular NFT collections is Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC), a collection of 10,000 apes on the Ethereum blockchain. It currently has a floor price of over 113 ether, or $351,868. To date, 496,700 ether, or $15,466,641,960, of volume for BAYC has been traded, according to OpenSea data<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cIf I sold my [BAYC] right now for 50 ETH, it would sell in two seconds. If I sell it at even 80 ETH, it would probably sell in a matter of seconds, too, just because of the current market,\u201d O\u2019Neill said.<\/p>\n While BAYC\u2019s floor price is near its all-time high, there was a time when it dropped 37% from February 26 to March 10, 2022, OpenSea data showed<\/a>, right before it launched its cryptocurrency, ApeCoin<\/a>. Prices have since recovered, but it\u2019s a signal that even the biggest NFT projects can face downturns.<\/p>\n In March 2022, Yuga Labs, the parent company behind BAYC and others, raised $450 million<\/a> in a massive seed round led by Andreessen Horowitz, valuing the firm at $4 billion. The NFT company showed no signs of slowing down even before this capital raise, acquiring CryptoPunks and Meebits from Larva Labs earlier that month to expand its position into popular NFT projects.<\/p>\n \u201cIn this market, I don\u2019t think there\u2019s necessarily a liquidity problem,\u201d O\u2019Neill said. \u201cThe liquidity problem will show up, though, when everyone wants to sell and when the market closes. The best time to sell is on the way up generally.\u201d<\/p>\n NFTs are far more liquid than the physical art market, O\u2019Neill said. \u201cIf you try to sell a painting that\u2019s worth more than a couple hundred dollars, you won\u2019t get any buying action unless you go to a traditional market.\u201d<\/p>\n While traditional art may have a less liquid market, blue-chip NFTs are limiting because to buy one, the full amount in cryptocurrency is required, which often limits the purchasing pool to a small group of people.<\/p>\n \u201cThe cheapest BAYC is north of $350,000 \u2014 if you have that in cash, you can put a down payment on a home,\u201d Josh Bobrowsky, CEO of Parzival Fund, said to TechCrunch. \u201cThat\u2019s something people don\u2019t realize is not only are these expensive, there\u2019s no leverage; if you buy a Lamborghini, you might only need $50,000 to put down on a $4 million Lamborghini. But if you want a BAYC, you need the full amount of cash in ethereum today, completely liquid.\u201d<\/p>\n In the past 30 days, there were 40,038 buyers across the top 10 NFT collections by sales volume, CryptoSlam data showed. While that may seem like a fair number of people, the NFT community overall had more than 458,424 monthly NFT traders in March, according to Dune Analytics data compiled by user hildobby<\/a>, so those 40,038 buyers only make up 8.7% of the total NFT trader ecosystem.<\/p>\n \u201cI always look at how many people are engaging; it matters how many people are engaging and buying,\u201d said William Quigley, co-founder of NFT marketplace WAX and previous co-founder of Tether, the world\u2019s largest stablecoin by trading volume.<\/p>\n \u201cFor example, if I look at a company and it sold one product for a million dollars to one person and another company sold a million articles of clothing for a dollar to a million people, I think I\u2019d do better with the million people,\u201d Quigley told TechCrunch. \u201cIn any given day, most of these NFT marketplaces and collections have single digits to several dozen people trading at super high prices \u2014 that\u2019s what you expect.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n <\/br><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n
\nTop NFT collections are bringing in millions of dollars weekly, but which will survive?<\/br>
\n2023-01-20 22:53:55<\/br><\/p>\nBored Apes are anything but boring<\/h2>\n
Limited buyers, but big spenders<\/h2>\n