wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source:https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2023\/01\/23\/the-ftc-fines-homeadvisor-up-to-7-2m-for-lying-about-lead-quality-and-other-matters\/<\/a><\/br> The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has ordered <\/a>home services marketplace HomeAdvisor<\/a> up to $7.2 million for its use of deceptive and misleading tactics in selling home improvement project leads to service providers, including small businesses operating in the gig economy. The fine is the first gig work-related penalty following the FTC\u2019s fall 2022 announcement<\/a> that it was prepared to crack down on unfair, deceptive, and anticompetitive practices taking place in the gig economy.<\/p>\n Dever-based HomeAdvisor had merged with Angie\u2019s List in 2017<\/a> to form a new public company called \u201cAngi.\u201d However, the FTC\u2019s charge against HomeAdvisor wasn\u2019t issued until March 2022<\/a>. The Commission said that since at least the middle of 2014, HomeAdvisor had made unsubstantiated, false or misleading claims about the leads it sells to service providers, like general contractors and lawn care professionals. Specifically, it claimed that the Angil affiliate had misrepresented the quality and source of leads, and the likelihood that they would result in actual jobs.<\/p>\n The Commission found that HomeAdvisor told service providers its leads resulted in home improvement jobs at higher rates than its own data supported and misled service providers about the cost of its one-month subscription to its platform. The company told service providers the first month of the mHelpDesk subscription, which helps with scheduling appointments and processing payments, was free with an annual membership package. But this was not true, the FTC said. Service providers would end up paying $59.99 more than they expected, it noted. (The mHelpDesk program is an optional add-on to the $287.99 annual membership to the HomeAdvisor network).<\/p>\n In addition, the FTC found that while HomeAdvisor claims its leads concern consumers who intend to soon hire a service professional in soon, many of them do not. This is in part because HomeAdvisor would resell leads from affiliates who generate leads from online forms that asked consumers about potential home projects they were considering. However, the company would claim the leads came from its own website, which suggested consumers were seeking out HomeAdvisor\u2019s assistance.<\/p>\n The FTC\u2019s complaint also said many of the leads didn\u2019t match the types of services the providers offered or were outside their preferred geographic area, despite HomeAdvisor\u2019s claims to the contrary.<\/p>\n \u201cGig economy platforms should not use false claims and phony opportunities to prey on workers and small businesses,\u201d said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC\u2019s Bureau of Consumer Protection, at the time of the original FTC order.<\/p>\n The new administrative order also bars HomeAdvisor from continuing its deceptive practices and sets up two redress funds to provide money to defrauded service providers. The first fund will make payments of up to $30 to service providers impacted by HomeAdvisor\u2019s misrepresentations about its lead quality. Meanwhile, the second fund will make payments of up to $59.99 to service providers who had been told that the first month of their mHelpDesk subscription was free. In total, HomeAdvisor is required to pay up to $7.2 million for redress, the FTC said. (Update: we earlier referenced this penalty as a \u201cfine.\u201d It is not technically a fine so we\u2019ve updated the wording.)<\/p>\n The Commission voted 4-0 to accept the proposed consent agreement.<\/p>\n This gig economy fine follows other warnings issued by the FTC, including one reminding MLMs (multi-level marketers<\/a>) to not lie to consumers about potential earnings. This one was sent out to 1,100 MLMs<\/a>, even if they were not under investigation. It also reminded<\/a> these companies it had previously sued MLMs like Herbalife and Advocare for their promotions of high-earning potential even though most participants made little or no money. Herbalife settled with the FTC for $200 million and Advocare agreed to pay $150 million. The FTC settled<\/a> with Amazon<\/a> as well for using misleading earnings claims to attract drivers to its Flex platform, and sued DeVry University<\/a> for false claims over the higher incomes graduates received.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n <\/br><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n
\nThe FTC orders HomeAdvisor to pay up to $7.2M for lying about lead quality and other matters<\/br>
\n2023-01-23 22:03:01<\/br><\/p>\n