wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source:https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2023\/01\/23\/paypal-germany-fco-proceeding\/<\/a><\/br> Veteran tech giant PayPal is facing an antitrust investigation in Germany \u2014 where the Federal Cartel Office (FCO) has announced<\/a> it\u2019s looking into its rules on surcharges.<\/p>\n The regulator is concerned that restrictions PayPal imposes on merchants could be harming competitors and inflating costs for consumers by restricting price competition.<\/p>\n Clauses in PayPal\u2019s terms the FCO said it\u2019s examining include traders not being allowed to offer their goods and services at lower prices if customers choose a cheaper payment method than PayPal; and sellers not being allowed to express any preference for payment methods other than PayPal, or to make an alternative payment tech more convenient for customers.<\/p>\n \u201cThe fees to be paid by sellers for using a payment service vary considerably depending on the payment method. Retailers usually pass these fees on to the product prices, so that consumers ultimately bear the costs of the payment services, even if these \u2013 unlike shipping costs, for example \u2013 are usually not reported separately to consumers,\u201d the FCO explained in a press release<\/a> [the original is in German; this is a machine translation of that text].<\/p>\n \u201cAccording to market studies, PayPal is not only the leading provider of online payments in Germany but also one of the most expensive online payment services. According to PayPal\u2019s price list, PayPal\u2019s standard fee in Germany is currently 2.49 \u2013 2.99 percent of the payment amount plus 34-39 cents per payment,\u201d it added.<\/p>\n Commenting in a statement Andreas Mundt, president of the FCO, said: \u201cThese clauses could restrict competition and constitute a violation of the prohibition on abuse. We will now examine what market power PayPal has and to what extent online retailers are dependent on offering PayPal as a payment method. If merchants are prevented from taking into account the different costs of the various payment methods with corresponding surcharges or discounts, other and new payment methods can hold their own less well in the price and quality competition or not even come onto the market. Payment services with market power could thus gain further leeway for their own pricing. The victims would then be the consumers in particular, who ultimately pay these higher costs indirectly through the product prices.\u201d<\/p>\n PayPal was contacted for a response.<\/span><\/p>\n While German antitrust activity has been garnering wider attention in recent years, after the country updated its competition rules at the startup of 2021 \u2014 arming the FCO with greater powers to proactively address the market power of digital giants \u2014 the proceeding against PayPal is not one of those special abuse control cases.<\/p>\n A spokesperson for the FCO confirmed in this case it\u2019s applying \u2018classic\u2019 competition rules \u2014 which means the regulator will first need to determine whether has a dominant position for payments before it can assess whether or not there has been any breach. So the proceeding may take some time to run its course.<\/p>\n In a separate antitrust action in Europe last year<\/a> \u2014 also concerning digital payments \u2014 the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets forced iOS maker Apple to allow dating apps operating in the market to use non-Apple-based payment technology to process in-app sales. Apple initially sought to challenge the order but after a string of penalty payments and several months of back and forth, it came with a proposal that was accepted by the watchdog last summer<\/a>.<\/p>\n In recent years, the European Union has also been eyeing online payment tech \u2014 taking action last year over restrictions Apple applies to Apple Pay<\/a>.<\/p>\n Such interventions prefigure bigger and potentially more impactful changes coming for tech giants in the European Union this year<\/a> as a major competition reform, called the Digital Markets Act, comes into application across the bloc. This \u201cex ante\u201d regime will flip the classical antitrust protocol \u2014 whereby market power must be assessed and investigation precedes remedy \u2014 by applying, up front, a set of fixed rules on platforms designated as competitively significant \u201cgatekeepers\u201d. So as to become more responsive and proactively level the playing field between giants and the smaller competitors that rely on them to reach consumers.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n <\/br><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n
\nGermany is looking into PayPal\u2019s terms for merchants<\/br>
\n2023-01-23 22:14:30<\/br><\/p>\n