wp-plugin-hostgator domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source: https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2022\/3\/29\/23000460\/social-media-mental-health-window-puberty<\/a> Social media use is more strongly linked to bad mental health for adolescents and teenagers during years around puberty and when they\u2019re probably about to leave home, according to a new study<\/a>. Teenagers who used social media more frequently in those periods scored lower on measures of life satisfaction one year later. <\/p>\n Many researchers say things like Instagram and TikTok probably aren\u2019t entirely bad for all adolescents. They\u2019re not entirely good, either, and can cause documented problems<\/a> with body image, but the impact varies: for some kids at some points in time, it might help them socialize and build relationships; for others at other times, it might be a hit to their self-esteem. <\/p>\n The challenge has been figuring out which teens are at risk \u2014 and when<\/em> they\u2019re at risk \u2014 so experts can develop strategies to help them. <\/p>\n \u201cAdolescence is a time of such massive cognitive, biological, and social change. These changes interface with social media in very interesting ways,\u201d says study author Amy Orben, a psychologist who heads the Digital Mental Health program at the University of Cambridge. \u201cThere\u2019s probably a huge amount of variability between how different individuals use social media and how their life influences their use.\u201d<\/p>\n It\u2019s a particular challenge because any impact of social media on mental health is likely to be small. \u201cPredicting mental health will always be in very small impacts because mental health and well-being are so complex,\u201d Orben says. \u201cAny one behavior will only be a very, very small slice of that pie.\u201d<\/p>\n To drill down on the relationship, Orben and her team first looked at a survey of over 72,000 people 10 to 80 years old in the United Kingdom. They were surveyed up to seven times each between 2011 and 2018 and asked a series of questions that included their life satisfaction and the amount of time they estimated they spent on social media each day. <\/p>\n Narrowing in on adolescents, the team found that for people in the 16- to 21-year-old age range, both very low and very high social media use were both linked with lower life satisfaction. In 10- to 15-year-olds, there wasn\u2019t <\/strong>much difference in life satisfaction between kids reporting low and high social media use. But in that group, girls with high social media use had lower life satisfaction than boys.<\/p>\n The team also examined data from a survey given to over 17,000 10- to 21-year-olds, identifying separate windows for boys and girls in their early teens where higher social media use was linked with lower life satisfaction a year later \u2014 14 to 15 for boys and 11 to 13 for girls. The relationship showed up for both sexes at age 19. The windows seem to map on to the start of puberty for both boys and girls (girls tend to hit puberty earlier) and a major social transition \u2014 many young adults in the UK <\/strong>leave home at around 19. <\/p>\n Other types of research could help figure out the reasons for those windows, Orben says: studies looking at things like sensitivity to social rejection or impulse control, compared with these sorts of data sets, could help understand why kids at certain ages might have worse experiences after using social media. <\/p>\n Orben cautioned that there are limitations to the study \u2014 it can\u2019t show that social media use caused changes in life satisfaction, just that there\u2019s a relationship. It also relies on people reporting how much they use social media, which could be inaccurate. That\u2019s a challenge for most social media research. Companies like Meta don\u2019t give researchers access<\/a> to internal data that could give scientists a more objective look at social media use \u2014 things like <\/strong>how long people use the platforms or who they\u2019re interacting with. <\/p>\n Future research could help identify the groups of adolescents and teenagers who might have the most negative impacts from social media. \u201cUnderstanding who\u2019s impacted, to what extent, how, and why helps create a better environment to negate those risks,\u201d Orben says. Social media isn\u2019t like sugar, she stresses \u2014 but experts understand the health impacts of things like sugar. They can give some people small policy nudges (like how the UK banned candy bars from checkout lines). They can also give people with existing health conditions, like diabetes, more direct help around their sugar intake. <\/p>\n Experts want to create similar policy frameworks or recommendations for social media, which could help keep especially vulnerable people from experiencing negative effects. But they need to get a better handle on the problem first \u2014 they still don\u2019t have enough understanding of who might benefit from what type of help, Orben says. \u201cWe don\u2019t fully understand the problem. So we can\u2019t address it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
<\/br><\/code><\/p>\n