Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wp-plugin-hostgator domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the ol-scrapes domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893
{"id":28449,"date":"2023-04-05T21:52:56","date_gmt":"2023-04-05T21:52:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/"},"modified":"2023-04-05T21:52:57","modified_gmt":"2023-04-05T21:52:57","slug":"drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/","title":{"rendered":"Drivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola"},"content":{"rendered":"

Source:https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2023\/04\/05\/uber-ola-gdpr-worker-data-access-rights-appeal\/<\/a><\/br>
\nDrivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola<\/br>
\n2023-04-05 21:52:56<\/br><\/p>\n

\n

In a major win over opaque algorithmic management in the so-called gig economy an appeals court in the Netherlands has found largely in favor of platform workers litigating against ride-hailing giants Uber and Ola \u2014 judging the platforms violated the drivers\u2019 rights in a number of instances, including when algorithms were involved in terminating driver accounts.<\/p>\n

The court also ruled the platforms cannot rely on trade secrets exemptions to deny drivers access to their data. Although challenges remain for regional workers to use existing laws to get enough visibility into platforms\u2019 data processing to know what information to ask for to be able to meaningfully exercise their data access rights.<\/p>\n

The appeal court rulings can be found here<\/a>, here<\/a> and here<\/a> (in Dutch).<\/p>\n

The appeal was brought by the not-for-profit data trust Worker Info Exchange (WIE) in support of members of the App Drivers & Couriers Union (ADCU) in the U.K. and a driver based in Portugal.<\/p>\n

One case against Uber\u2019s robo-firings involved four drivers (three based in the U.K., one in Portugal); a second case against Uber over data access involved six U.K.-based drivers; while a data access case against Ola involved thee U.K.-based drivers.<\/p>\n

In the data access cases drivers were seeking information such as passenger ratings, fraud probability scores, earning profiles, as well as data on the allocation of journeys to drivers \u2014 including Uber\u2019s batch matching and upfront pricing systems \u2014 as well as information about the existence of automated decision-making touching their work on the platforms.<\/p>\n

Several decisions taken by the ride-hailing platforms were found to meet the relevant legal test of automated decision-making \u2014 including assigning rides; calculating prices; rating drivers; calculating \u2018fraud probability scores\u2019; and deactivating drivers\u2019 accounts in response to suspicions of fraud \u2014 meaning drivers are entitled to information on the underlying logic of these decisions. (And also to a right to meaningful human review if they object to decisions.)<\/p>\n

\u201cThe court ordered that Uber must explain how driver personal data and profiling is used in Uber\u2019s upfront, dynamic pay and pricing system. Similarly, the court ordered Uber to transparently disclose how automated decision making and worker profiling is used to determine how work is allocated amongst a waiting workforce,\u201d said WIE in a press release<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cOla Cabs was also ordered to disclose meaningful information about the use in automated decision making of worker earnings profiles and so called \u2018fraud probability scores\u2019 used in automated decision making for work and fares allocation. The court also ruled that internally held profiles relating drivers and associated performance related tags must be disclosed to drivers.\u201d<\/p>\n

Commenting in a statement, James Farrar, director of WIE, added:<\/p>\n

\n

This ruling is a huge win for gig economy workers in Britain and right across Europe. The information asymmetry & trade secrets protections relied upon by gig economy employers to exploit workers and deny them even the most basic employment rights for fundamentals like pay, work allocation and unfair dismissals must now come to an end as a result of this ruling. Uber, Ola Cabs and all other platform employers cannot continue to get away with concealing the controlling hand of an employment relationship in clandestine algorithms.<\/p>\n

Too many workers have had their working lives and mental health destroyed by false claims of fraudulent activity without any opportunity to know precisely what allegations have been made let alone answer them. Instead, to save money and avoid their responsibility as employers, platforms have built unjust automated HR decision making systems with no humans in the loop. Left unchecked, such callous systems risk becoming the norm in the future world of work. I\u2019m grateful for the moral courage of the courts expressed in this important ruling.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The companies have been given two months to provide the requested information to the drivers (with the risk of fines of daily several thousand euros apiece for non-compliance), as well as being ordered to pick up the majority of the case costs.<\/p>\n

Taking the algorithm to court<\/h2>\n

Legal challenges against the algorithmic management practices of Uber and Ola were originally lodged on behalf of drivers in the U.K. back in 2020 \u2014 in July<\/a> and September<\/a> \u2014\u00a0centred on digital and data access rights enshrined in the European Union\u2019s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).<\/p>\n

The pan-EU regulation provides individuals with rights to data held on them and information about algorithmic decision making applied to them \u2014 where it has a substantial or legal effect (such as employment\/access to work). And while the U.K. is no longer an EU member it transposed the European data protection framework into national law before leaving the bloc. Which means that (for now) it retains the same suite of data rights.<\/p>\n

The appeal court decisions yesterday follow earlier judgements, in March 2021<\/a>, by the Court of Amsterdam \u2014 which did not accept the robo-firing charges in those instances and largely rejected the drivers\u2019 requests for specific data. However the court also tossed the platforms\u2019 arguments seeking to deny the right of workers to collectively organize their data and establish a data trust as an abuse of GDPR data access rights \u2014 leaving the door open to fresh challenges.<\/p>\n

Transparency is a key lever in the fight for platform workers rights since there\u2019s no way for workers to assess the fairness of algorithms or automated decisions being applied to them without having access to information on the processes involved. So this ruling looks significant in that it could help crack open black boxes systems used for algorithmic management of workforces in a way that has, oftentimes, shielded platforms from scrutiny over the fairness (or indeed legality) of their decisions.<\/p>\n

This is also a class of worker that still typically lacks full employment rights and protections, exacerbating the power imbalance vs data-mining platforms and supercharging the risks of worker exploitation. (Albeit, legal challenges in Europe have unpicked some bogus claims of self employment by platforms; while planned EU legislation in this area aims to tackle worker precariousness by setting minimum standards for platform work.)<\/p>\n

While the legal challenges against Uber and Ola involved a small number of drivers, and the rulings naturally reference their individual circumstances, the appeal victory could force gig platforms to change their process \u2014 not least to avoid the risk of more challenges being filed.<\/p>\n

Conditions of their licences to operate in markets like London may also create regulatory problems for them if they\u2019re seen to be failing to prevent recurrences of data protection issues, the litigants suggest.<\/p>\n

Although it also may not yet be the end of the road for these particular cases as the companies could seek to appeal the decisions to the Dutch Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

In a statement an Uber spokesperson told us it is \u201ccarefully\u201d studying the rulings, adding that it will take a decision on whether to file an appeal \u201cin due course\u201d.<\/p>\n

(Ola was also contacted for comment but at the time of writing it had not responded.)<\/p>\n

In other remarks provided to TechCrunch Uber said:<\/p>\n

\n

We are disappointed that the court did not recognize the robust processes we have in place, including meaningful human review, when making a decision to deactivate a driver\u2019s account due to suspected fraud. Uber<\/span> maintains the position that these decisions were based on human review and not on automated decision making, which was acknowledged earlier by the previous court. These rulings only relate to a few specific drivers from the UK that were deactivated in the period between 2018 and 2020 in relation to very specific circumstances.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Uber also flagged one instance in which it said the appeal court found it did have meaningful human involvement in an automated decision related to a termination.<\/p>\n

In the other cases, where the court found in favor of the litigants over robo-firings, Uber was unable to prove that the human intervention was much more than a \u201csymbolic act\u201d \u2014 meaning it could not demonstrate the staff involved had been able to exercise a meaningful check on the automated decision that led to drivers being fired.<\/p>\n

On this WIE<\/a> said the drivers in the lawsuit faced \u201cspurious allegations of \u2018fraudulent activity\u2019 by Uber and were dismissed without appeal\u201d. \u201cWhen the drivers requested an explanation for how Uber systems had surveilled their work and wrongly determined they had engaged in fraud, Uber stonewalled them,\u201d it claimed, adding: \u201cThe decision to dismiss the drivers was taken remotely at an Uber office in Krakow and the drivers were denied any opportunity to be heard. The court noted that Uber had failed to make \u2018clear what the qualifications and level of knowledge of the employees in question are. There was thus insufficient evidence of actual human intervention.’\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Discussing the outcome of the appeal in a phone call with TechCrunch, Farrer \u2014 a former Uber driver who has also successfully sued the ride-hailing giant over the employment status of U.K. drivers<\/a> \u2014 said it would be \u201cfoolish\u201d if the platforms seek to appeal to the Supreme Court.\u00a0\u201cNot only is the ruling, very decisive but it\u2019s very sensible,\u201d he told us. \u201cAnd it also gives them very sensible guidance, in my opinion, in how you should be managing the platform in this way.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat the court was coming down against Uber on was this very absolutist approach that they took to managing fairly straightforward HR problems,\u201d he argued, describing it as \u201cnonsense\u201d for platforms to fire someone for alleged fraud but refuse to tell them why, preventing them from responding to the charges by claiming doing so would undermine trade secrets and platform security.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s nonsense. Anybody can see that. And that\u2019s what they relied on. They relied on being able to get away with doing that. And so, okay, you may choose to \u2014 foolishly \u2014 appeal that or you may want to take a sensible line that that\u2019s not really a sensible or sustainable position to take. But if you want to continue taking it we\u2019ll continue beating you on it. So I think, if they\u2019re up for it, there\u2019s some really good learning points and signposting for them \u2014 about how platforms in the modern day ought to be going about managing people.\u201d<\/p>\n

On the data access issue, Farrer said the outcome of the appeal shows they\u2019re \u201cbumping up against the limits of the law\u201d \u2014 since the court upheld some earlier decisions to withhold data from drivers based on their asks not being specific enough. The Catch-22-style situation here is if the platforms aren\u2019t fully up-front and transparent about the data they\u2019re processing how can the drivers know what to ask them for with enough specificity to get given the data? So setting governance on platform transparency is an area lawmakers should be focused on.<\/p>\n

\u201cOn that point we didn\u2019t make significant progress,\u201d he said. \u201cWe asked for access to all personal data. And then the platforms kicked back and \u2014 denial and obfuscation \u2014 either say you need to specify [the data you want] or they\u2019ll tell you they\u2019re taking a \u2018phased approach\u2019, whatever that is \u2014 but without telling you that that\u2019s what they\u2019re doing. So they\u2019ll give you some data and then later, if you complain, they can say, well, we were taking a phased approach. But they forgot to tell anyone.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd here what the court is saying is that if you\u2019re not getting all the data you think you want then you have an obligation, under Article 15, to go back and say, what are the categories of data you\u2019re processing and then hone your requests based on on that. But\u2026 that\u2019s where we reach the limits of the law, I suppose. Because if these companies are not really very clear or transparent, or if they\u2019re vague about the categories of data they say the processing, then you\u2019re still in that chicken and egg problem that you don\u2019t know what you don\u2019t know. So that still kind of remains the same.\u201d<\/p>\n

Per Farrer, the litigants did get one good result on this aspect via the appeal \u2014 in relation to data processing categories in an Uber guidance document, which he said the court agreed Uber should have to hand over. \u201cSo I think what the court is saying is that when you\u2019re able to be more specific there\u2019s very little defence [in withholding data]. So when we\u2019re getting to the specifics around automated decision-making, or also information about automated decision-making, as well as data processing around some of these difficult decisions, then, yeah, there\u2019s little defense in not giving it.\u201d<\/p>\n

Gig worker rights organizations are also concerned about emergent rights risks coming down the pipe \u2014 warning, for example, about the rise of personalized pricing (aka dynamic pricing) \u2014 as platforms seek ever more complex systems for calculating and fragmenting payments to workers (and, indeed, the amounts billed to users).<\/p>\n

Dynamic pricing not only clearly boosts opacity around how the platforms\u2019 payment\/charging systems work but could create fresh opportunities for harm by scaling unfairness and discrimination on both sides of two-sided marketplaces and in ever more multi-faceted ways. (Such as, for example, female users facing higher surge prices at night based on the perception of increased vulnerability.)<\/p>\n

WIE points to a paper<\/a> published in the Harvard Business Review last year that warned algorithmic pricing systems pose policy challenges which are far broader than collusive conduct \u2014 and can lead to higher prices for consumers in competitive markets (even without collusion; so outside traditional antitrust law) \u2014 with the researchers called for pricing regulation to prevent harms. And it argues pretty much the same set of harms issues arise for platform workers subject to dynamic pricing too.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is very important for us to be able to help workers understand the basis for how and what they\u2019re being paid but also to safeguard against personalization in pay \u2014 either directly or indirectly,\u201d said Farrer on this. \u201cThese platforms have furiously denied personalization in pay. But sure, what\u2019s the optimization in here then? I mean it\u2019s going to happen directly or indirectly and we absolutely have to have an eagle eye on it, because if not, there will be abuses because the controls aren\u2019t there. And because as these platforms seek to optimise that\u2019s the effect it\u2019s going to have \u2014 either directly or indirectly.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n
\n

3. Platforms such as Uber and Ola cannot rely on trade secrets exemptions, as these “claims were entirely disproportionate relative to the negative effect of unexplained automated dismissal and disciplining of workers.”<\/p>\n

\u2014 Jill Toh (@jilltoh) April 4, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

What will WIE be doing with the driver information it has been to extract from platforms?<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are already starting to get data at scale \u2014 and we are working with data scientists at the moment to build the analytics we need to [build workers\u2019 collective bargaining power],\u201d said Farrer. \u201cWhere it\u2019s transformative is\u2026 there\u2019s an information power asymmetry between the worker and the platform. The workers have very weak bargaining power because of the oversubscription problem. Because of the lack of a sensible employment relationship that confers rights. Because of the difficulty in building collective union participation, although that\u2019s changing rapidly for ADCU.<\/p>\n

\u201cThen we need to find the means to building that collective power. Platforms trade on our personal data but it\u2019s our personal data so we have to try and beat them at their own game \u2014 or fight them in their own game \u2014 by aggregating that data. And aggregating that data will be able to tell what are the true pay conditions. Because so many workers have to rely on the myth of what the platform is telling them, rather than what\u2019s really happening\u2026 And that picture is actually getting more complex. Because companies like Uber and Deliveroo they\u2019re not happy just to rely on set pay being highly variable. They actually want to take a sledgehammer to the pay structure and fragment it into more and more pieces \u2014 incentives for this, bonus for this, boost for this \u2014 so by the time you\u2019re done you don\u2019t know what you\u2019re being paid or what the basis of your pay is. And that\u2019s a very deliberate thing\u2026 And the move to dynamic pay is a big part of that.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are already getting enough information to be very useful. So we seem to have ironed out some of those problems in that at least what we\u2019re getting is the trip information. So we can we can do analysis on that much at least,\u201d he added. \u201cBut there\u2019s still, of course, and there will always be a battle over the level of algorithmic transparency that\u2019s required from the workers relative to what these platforms are willing to do.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd, of course, their message of algorithmic control is a moveable feast. We\u2019ve seen that over the last couple of years \u2014 with upfront pricing and now dynamic pricing. Those are progressive changes in the development of the platform and our job is to try and understand the processing that\u2019s going on with that \u2014 and that\u2019s a moveable feast in that there\u2019s always going to be a challenge because we\u2019re going to want to know and they\u2019re going to want to not tell us.\u201d<\/p>\n

Uber et al.\u2019s push-back on calls for greater transparency is \u2014 typically \u2014 to claim their anti-fraud systems won\u2019t work if workers know enough about how they function to be able to circumvent them. They also tend to claim they\u2019re prevented from releasing more data because they\u2019re protecting passengers\u2019 privacy. (It remains to be seen what multi-tiered excuses platforms will drum up to argue against providing total pay transparency.)<\/p>\n

Farrer responds to such lines by suggesting the platforms are seeking to deflect attention off their own security failings and management and regulatory deficiencies \u2014 by creating a red-herring concept of driver \u201cfraud\u201d in order to foist blame for their own business management failings onto rights denuded workers.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s no real plausible way that the driver can defraud the platform \u2014 because they don\u2019t have access to any kind of credit card information or anything behind the scene. And I think the whole idea of account account security is a sensitive issue for Uber, and certainly their investors, because they need to maintain the confidence of passengers that if you give me your personal data and your credit card details, it\u2019ll be secure. So I think for them they would either consciously or unconsciously prefer to blame their platform security problems on the worker, rather than admitting that they may have their own cybersecurity problems to deal with,\u201d he suggested.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese are hollowed out companies,\u201d he added. \u201cThey want to automate as much of the management inside the company as they do service delivery outside the company. So if they can find a way to tack something on an 80:20 [system accuracy] basis that\u2019s good enough for them because the workers have no recourse anyway. And anyway, the whole nature of the platform is to be massively over oversubscribed. So they\u2019re not short of drivers that they can just sling off.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe truth of it is, is that transport business \u2014 I don\u2019t care whether it\u2019s road transport, air, rail \u2014 it\u2019s a capital intensive, labour intensive, low margin business, and it always has been. But you can still make money in it. But what these platforms thought they could do is descend from the cloud, deny they\u2019re a transport operator, insist that they\u2019re a technology company, and cream margins away from that business that were never there to begin with. And so unless they want to acclimatize themselves to the industry that they\u2019re in \u2014 and figure out how they can make money in a low margin business, instead of trying to take the easy way and illegal way \u2014 then, yeah, they are going to face annihilation. But maybe if they get some sensible people in to understand how to devise a strategy for the business they\u2019re really in, not the business they want to be in, then maybe they\u2019ve have better luck.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the EU, lawmakers are aiming to make it harder for platforms to just sling off precarious workers \u2014 by setting down minimum standards atop a (rebuttable) presumption of employment for gig workers. Although the file has proved divisive with Member States and the Council still hasn\u2019t adopted a negotiating position. But MEPs in the parliament agreed their position back in February<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The litigants are calling for EU lawmakers to get on and pass this reform to improve protections for gig workers<\/a>. And while Farrer confirms they won\u2019t stop filing legal challenges to try to unpick exploitation he argues there\u2019s a clear need for lawmakers to get a handle on the power imbalance and pass proper regulation to guarantee workers are protected without needing to spend years fighting through the courts. (The much touted modern working practices employment reforms, promised by former U.K. PM Theresa May in the wake of the 2017 Taylor review<\/a>, ended with a damp squib package of measures <\/a>that unions savaged on arrival as \u201cbig on grandiose claims, light on substance\u201d; and which Farrer dismisses now as \u201cnothing\u201d having being done.)<\/p>\n

He also suggests regulators are sleeping on the job \u2014 pointing, for example, to Transport for London\u2019s (TfL) licensing for Uber which requires any changes to its business model need to be communicated to it 30 days in advance. Yet when WIE asked TfL if it\u2019s reviewed Uber\u2019s switch to upfront pricing the regulator failed to respond. (We\u2019ve reached out to TfL with questions about this and will update this report with any response.)<\/p>\n

\u201cWorkers are already in a very weak position. But if you\u2019ve got this tacit collusion problem, well, that amounts to grey- and black-listing of the worker \u2014 and that\u2019s illegal under employment law. So for those reasons, we really have our work cut out to to aggregate this data and keep a very close eye on this,\u201d he said, adding: \u201cWe need a platform worker directive equivalent in the U.K.\u201d<\/p>\n

Where workers right are concerned there\u2019s actually more bad news zooming into view in the U.K. \u2014 where the government is in the processing of passing a data reform bill<\/a> the litigants warn will strip away some of the protections workers have been able to exercise in this case. Such as a requirement to carry out a data protection impact assessment (a procedure that would typically entail platforms consulting with workers \u2014 so the reform looks set to discourage that type of engagement by platforms).<\/p>\n

The draft bill also proposes to raise the threshold for individuals to get access to their data by allowing more leeway to platforms to deny requests \u2014 which could mean workers in the U.K. have the added challenge of having to argue for the validity of their right to access their own data, even to just get a chance of a sniff of seeing any of the stuff.<\/p>\n

So, as it stands, U.K. lawmakers are intending to burden workers with even more friction atop a process that can already take years of legal action to see even a partial victory. Making life harder for platform workers to exercise their rights obviously won\u2019t tip the already-stacked scales on gig economy exploitation.<\/p>\n

The litigants are urging parliamentarians to amend the draft reform to ensure key protections stand. (Albeit, given the U.K.\u2019s sclerotic record in this area, it may take a change of government before there\u2019s any meaningful action to rein in platform power and support workers rights.)<\/p>\n

In a statement, Farrer dubbed the ruling \u201ca bittersweet victory considering that the U.K. government plans to strip workers of the very protections successfully claimed in this case\u201d, adding: \u201cLawmakers must learn important lessons from this case, amend the bill and protect these vital rights before it is too late. Similarly, the Council of the European Union must not hesitate in passing the proposed Platform Work Directive as passed by the European Parliament.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/br><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n

Science, Tech, Technology<\/br>
\n<\/br>
\nSource:
https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2023\/04\/05\/uber-ola-gdpr-worker-data-access-rights-appeal\/<\/a><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Source:https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2023\/04\/05\/uber-ola-gdpr-worker-data-access-rights-appeal\/ Drivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola 2023-04-05 21:52:56 In a major win over opaque algorithmic management in the so-called gig economy an appeals court in the Netherlands has found largely in favor of platform workers litigating against ride-hailing giants Uber and Ola \u2014 judging the platforms violated the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":28450,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"pagelayer_contact_templates":[],"_pagelayer_content":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[26,17,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28449","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-science","category-tech","category-technology"],"yoast_head":"\nDrivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola - Science and Nerds<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Drivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola - Science and Nerds\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Source:https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2023\/04\/05\/uber-ola-gdpr-worker-data-access-rights-appeal\/ Drivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola 2023-04-05 21:52:56 In a major win over opaque algorithmic management in the so-called gig economy an appeals court in the Netherlands has found largely in favor of platform workers litigating against ride-hailing giants Uber and Ola \u2014 judging the platforms violated the […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Science and Nerds\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-04-05T21:52:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-04-05T21:52:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola_642dedb9350de.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"592\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"20 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/\",\"name\":\"Drivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola - Science and Nerds\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola_642dedb9350de.jpeg?fit=592%2C400&ssl=1\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-04-05T21:52:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-04-05T21:52:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ea2991abeb2b9ab04b32790dff28360e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola_642dedb9350de.jpeg?fit=592%2C400&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola_642dedb9350de.jpeg?fit=592%2C400&ssl=1\",\"width\":592,\"height\":400},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Drivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/\",\"name\":\"Science and Nerds\",\"description\":\"My WordPress Blog\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ea2991abeb2b9ab04b32790dff28360e\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e6e14fc6691445ef2b2c0a3a6c43882?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e6e14fc6691445ef2b2c0a3a6c43882?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Drivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola - Science and Nerds","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Drivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola - Science and Nerds","og_description":"Source:https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2023\/04\/05\/uber-ola-gdpr-worker-data-access-rights-appeal\/ Drivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola 2023-04-05 21:52:56 In a major win over opaque algorithmic management in the so-called gig economy an appeals court in the Netherlands has found largely in favor of platform workers litigating against ride-hailing giants Uber and Ola \u2014 judging the platforms violated the […]","og_url":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/","og_site_name":"Science and Nerds","article_published_time":"2023-04-05T21:52:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-04-05T21:52:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":592,"height":400,"url":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola_642dedb9350de.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"20 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/","url":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/","name":"Drivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola - Science and Nerds","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola_642dedb9350de.jpeg?fit=592%2C400&ssl=1","datePublished":"2023-04-05T21:52:56+00:00","dateModified":"2023-04-05T21:52:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ea2991abeb2b9ab04b32790dff28360e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola_642dedb9350de.jpeg?fit=592%2C400&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola_642dedb9350de.jpeg?fit=592%2C400&ssl=1","width":592,"height":400},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2023\/04\/05\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Drivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/","name":"Science and Nerds","description":"My WordPress Blog","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ea2991abeb2b9ab04b32790dff28360e","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e6e14fc6691445ef2b2c0a3a6c43882?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e6e14fc6691445ef2b2c0a3a6c43882?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com"],"url":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/drivers-in-europe-net-big-data-rights-win-against-uber-and-ola_642dedb9350de.jpeg?fit=592%2C400&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28449","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28449"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28449\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28451,"href":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28449\/revisions\/28451"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28450"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28449"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28449"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28449"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}