wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source: https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2022\/4\/8\/23017059\/samsung-galaxy-watch-smartwatch-wearables<\/a> While all gadgets have their design challenges, there\u2019s one that continues to plague smartwatches \u2014 battery life. There are a few ways to mitigate that, but unfortunately, many smartwatch makers choose the absolute worst solution: making the smartwatch bigger.<\/p>\n The latest example might be Samsung. According to a SamMobile <\/em>report<\/a>, the company is mulling a \u201cPro\u201d version of the next-generation Galaxy Watch. Details were scant, except for one thing: this \u201cPro\u201d model could potentially pack a much larger 572mAh battery.<\/p>\n If true, that would be a meaningful upgrade. Poor battery life is one of the biggest complaints users<\/a> have<\/a> reported<\/a> with Samsung\u2019s Galaxy Watch 4 lineup<\/a>. It\u2019s also common for \u201cPro\u201d models to act as the premium option with longer battery life, better materials, and, unfortunately, the biggest honking display possible.<\/p>\n
\n
<\/br><\/code><\/p>\n