wp-plugin-hostgator domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source:https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2023\/05\/24\/the-surgeon-generals-advisory-on-risks-of-youth-social-media-use-could-shift-the-conversation\/<\/a><\/br> A new public health warning this week from the U.S. surgeon general explores concerns that social media use among children and teens poses serious risks that science has only just begun to understand.<\/p>\n \u201c\u2026 The current body of evidence indicates that while social media may have benefits for some children and adolescents, there are ample indicators that social media can also have a profound risk of harm to the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents,\u201d U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy wrote in the advisory<\/a>. \u201cAt this time, we do not yet have enough evidence to determine if social media is sufficiently safe for children and adolescents.\u201d<\/p>\n The advisory acknowledges the positive impacts of youth social media use, noting that social platforms connect young people with others who share their interests and identities while fostering self expression. These upsides are well-explored and basically ubiquitous at this point, but the more hidden, potentially lasting negative effects of social media on young people are much less explored.<\/p>\n \u201cNearly every teenager in America uses social media, and yet we do not have enough evidence to conclude that it is sufficiently safe for them,\u201d the advisory warns. \u201cOur children have become unknowing participants in a decades-long experiment.\u201d<\/p>\n Like many phenomena that grew out of the tech scene, social media indeed moved fast while breaking things over the course of the last decade and change, reshuffling social behavior and the human brain in the process. While the adult brain is settled enough to weather those changes, this report and others raise the alarm that children and adolescents are now regularly exposed to forces that can have lasting negative impacts on brain and behavior alike.<\/p>\n \u201cAdolescents, ages 10 to 19, are undergoing a highly sensitive period of brain development,\u201d Murthy wrote. \u201c\u2026In early adolescence, when identities and sense of self-worth are forming, brain development is especially susceptible to social pressures, peer opinions, and peer comparison.\u201d<\/p>\n A recent study<\/a> from researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill imaged middle schoolers\u2019 brains and found that how frequently they checked social media apps (Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat) correlated with changes in the amygdala that mapped onto ongoing sensitivity toward rewards and punishments. Other studies have explored how rejection on social media could affect structures in the brain that respond to social stimuli, noting that these responses are amplified in young, developing brains.<\/p>\n \u201cBecause adolescence is a vulnerable period of brain development, social media exposure during this period warrants additional scrutiny,\u201d Murthy wrote.<\/p>\n The advisory acknowledges the disproportionate burden that parents and families now shoulder, navigating social media use without adequate tools or resources to properly protect young people from its potential harms. Murthy calls on policymakers and tech companies to come together for a \u201cmultifaceted approach\u201d that the U.S. has followed with other products that pose risks to children:<\/p>\n \u201cThe U.S. has a strong history of taking action in such circumstances. In the case of toys, transportation, and medications\u2014among other sectors that have widespread adoption and impact on children\u2014the U.S. has often adopted a safety-first approach to mitigate the risk of harm to consumers. According to this principle, a basic threshold for safety must be met, and until safety is demonstrated with rigorous evidence and independent evaluation, protections are put in place to minimize the risk of harm from products, services, or goods.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n The surgeon general\u2019s specific policy recommendations include implementing higher standards for youth data privacy, enforced age minimums, deepening research in these areas and weaving digital media literacy education into cirriculums.<\/p>\n A report earlier this month from the American Psychological Association<\/a> also flagged the potential serious downsides of social media on developing brains and encouraged an open dialogue between kids and parents around their online activity. While that report and the surgeon general\u2019s advisory ultimately frame social media as a neutral tool that is \u201cnot inherently beneficial or harmful to young people,\u201d the latter presents the issue in the frame of a public health crisis, calling for urgent action to mitigate the potential harm of developing minds increasingly steeping in online spaces.<\/p>\n While the advisory itself isn\u2019t guaranteed to move the needle, it does usefully present youth social media use as a public health crisis \u2014 a shift for an issue that is often punted to parents or defined by tech companies\u2019 own rosy talking points. In the past, surgeon general\u2019s advisories have reshaped the national dialogue<\/a> around public health threats like smoking and drunk driving. They\u2019ve also kicked off eras of evidence-free scaremongering, like a 1982 advisory<\/a> that warned video games were hazardous to young people. (Unlike that advisory, Murthy\u2019s new report is paired with a much deeper emerging body of scientific evidence.)<\/p>\n The White House followed the surgeon general\u2019s office with its own proposal<\/a> to launch an interagency task force on the issue, bringing agencies including the Department of Education, the FTC and the DOJ together to coordinate on the youth mental health crisis. What will come of these advisories remains to be seen \u2014 and many different political agendas masquerade as efforts to protect children<\/a>. Task forces have a reputation for inefficacy, but slowly steering the conversation around social media and kids\u2019 mental health toward a public health framing could prove useful in the long term.<\/p>\n The issue comes up time and time again in Congressional hearings, but the possibility of thoughtful U.S. regulation addressing tech\u2019s ability to manipulate the behavior of young users while monetizing their data continues to take a backseat to partisan politics and political grandstanding<\/a>. While the EU passes meaningful new rules for social media like the Digital Services Act<\/a>, lawmakers in the U.S. continue to fail on core, cross-platform issues like data privacy and dangerous content.<\/p>\n \u201cOur children and adolescents don\u2019t have the luxury of waiting years until we know the full extent of social media\u2019s impact,\u201d the advisory warns. \u201cTheir childhoods and development are happening now.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n <\/br><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n
\nThe surgeon general\u2019s advisory on risks of youth social media use could shift the conversation<\/br>
\n2023-05-24 21:41:43<\/br><\/p>\n\n