wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source:https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2023\/06\/13\/itoka-wants-to-license-ai-generated-music-via-the-blockchain\/<\/a><\/br> AI-generated music is fast becoming a reality. Thanks to tools like Meta\u2019s MusicGen<\/a>, it\u2019s now possible to create halfway decent songs in a range of styles without ever having to play an instrument, read sheet music or learn to use a DAW<\/a>.<\/p>\n But while the creative potential of generative AI music tools is nothing less than extraordinary, the tools also threaten to upend the music industry\u2019s copyright status quo. That\u2019s because, in order to \u201clearn\u201d to create new songs, the tools must be \u201ctrained\u201d on vast databases of existing songs \u2014 not always with the artists\u2019 blessings.<\/p>\n It\u2019s pitting musicians against labels. Universal Music Group has labeled all AI-generated music using existing artists\u2019 voices as \u201cfraud.\u201d On the other hand, art-pop musician Grimes vowed to allow her voice to be used in AI music without penalty.<\/p>\n The rules around AI-generated music are murky at present. Several lawsuits<\/a> making their way through the courts will likely have a bearing on music-generating AI, including one pertaining to the rights of artists whose work is used to train AI systems without their knowledge or consent. But it\u2019ll be months before the first decisions are made public and months more, potentially, if the cases are appealed.<\/p>\n In the meantime, some startups, attempting to get ahead of regulators, are proposing standards of their own around generative music IP. One is Itoka<\/a>, which was recently accepted into the Allen Institute for AI\u2019s startup incubation program.<\/p>\n Itoka, co-founded by Malcolm Yang and Yihao Chen, seeks to \u201ctokenize\u201d music content, specifically AI-generated content, on the blockchain so that creators can independently license that content and receive compensation every time it\u2019s used. Itoka plans to temporarily hold the ownership of songs and give creators full licenses for their commercial use, while at the same time preventing plagiarization and \u201cunlawful monetization\u201d on its platform.<\/p>\n \u201cItoka is a decentralized music platform we developed to enable data self-sovereignty, the permanence of music storage, digital rights management, global music accessibility and creator governance,\u201d Yang and Chen told TechCrunch in an email interview. \u201cWe establish a new paradigm for copyright protection that doesn\u2019t rely on the physical copyright office to enforce the legal status but rather on code-operated smart contracts.\u201d<\/p>\n
\nItoka wants to license AI-generated music via the blockchain<\/br>
\n2023-06-13 21:40:09<\/br><\/p>\n