wp-plugin-hostgator domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source:https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2023\/06\/13\/how-to-pitch-me-10-investors-discuss-what-theyre-looking-for-in-june-2023\/<\/a><\/br> Let\u2019s explode a few<\/span> myths.<\/p>\n For starters: the tech industry is not a meritocracy. There\u2019s a direct correlation between the size and strength of your network and your chances of success.<\/p>\n Second: it\u2019s relatively easy to connect with reputable investors. Most firms\u2019 websites have email addresses and contact forms.<\/p>\n There are a myriad of reasons why startups fail to get off the ground, but it generally boils down to three things:<\/p>\n This month, all ten \u201cHow to pitch me\u201d participants shared their investment thesis, along with tactical advice for nontechnical founders and the questions they expect entrepreneurs to ask them<\/strong><\/em> during pitch meetings.<\/p>\n Consider yourself on notice: with deal flow down across the board, \u201capplying fake time pressure to get a VC to make a quick decision\u201d no longer works, said Blair Garrou of Mercury Fund.<\/p>\n \u201cArtificially engineered FOMO is out,\u201d said Monique Woodard, managing director of Cake Ventures. \u201cShowing momentum is great, but I guard against being overly influenced by short timelines and the participation of other investors.\u201d<\/p>\n Respondents also ballparked salaries for pre-revenue startups, discussed the pros and cons of using pitch memos vs. full decks, and all shared what they\u2019re reading, watching and listening to. (This group loved \u201cSuccession\u201d so much, they would probably take a pitch meeting with Kendall Roy.)<\/p>\n Thanks very much to everyone who took the time to respond! If you\u2019re an early-stage investor who\u2019d like to be included in future columns, email\u00a0guestcolumns@techcrunch.com<\/a>\u00a0with \u201cHow to pitch me\u201d in the subject line.<\/p>\n These responses have been edited for length and clarity. Here\u2019s who participated this month:<\/p>\n What kinds of investment opportunities are you looking for in June 2023? How do you prefer to be approached: a cold email, a warm intro or another method? Many laid-off engineers are launching their own startups: What are some of the skills\/experience you look for in nontechnical founders? For nontechnical founders, I get excited about how they can lean into their strengths: (1) deep domain expertise in the sectors they are starting a company (something we often see in vertical SaaS companies where founders have \u201clived the problem; (2) an ability to recruit and hire amazing talent around them; and (3) a keen sense of customer focus, understanding of market dynamics and business model planning that is important and often the strength of nontechnical founders.<\/p>\n Generally speaking, how much salary should the founder of a pre-revenue startup pay themselves? In June 2023, what are some of the top questions founders should be asking investors? This is very important in the current environment. And of course, take a look at the talent, marketing and biz dev help that an investor\u2019s firm and personal network can bring to bear for your company.<\/p>\n Founders should also ask for references \u2014 what companies has that fund worked with, especially the partner leading the deal, so they can get a fuller sense of what the journey will be like with that fund and partner. This is a long-term relationship, so doing as much work upfront matters!<\/p>\n Are you open to reviewing pitch memos, or do you prefer a completed deck? It surprises me how many cold banker pitches me and my colleagues receive! A memo is fine as long as it is coherent, provides the necessary info and is concise.<\/p>\n Tell us about the best pitch you\u2019ve received recently: At what point in their presentation did you realize you were going to invest? Within the first 10 minutes they had laid out: (1) how well the company was doing; (2) how big the market opportunity was; and (3) why they had an unfair advantage as founders over everyone else. It was incredibly concise, straightforward and compelling to hear.<\/p>\n What are you reading\/watching\/listening to?<\/strong><\/p>\n I\u2019m currently reading \u201cChip War\u201d by Chris Miller, a fantastic account of the development and subsequent battle over the most critical resource today \u2014 microchips. It\u2019s an especially helpful lens to view the need for compute infrastructure in building AI companies today. I just finished watching \u201cSuccession,\u201d so I need a new show!<\/p>\n What kinds of investment opportunities are you looking for in June 2023?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n We are aggressively investing out of Fund I and focus on U.S.-based pre-seed and seed stage companies that fit into one or more layers of the investment thesis at Cake. Cake Ventures has a clear investment thesis: invest in companies with global ambitions who are creating technology products that meet the needs of tomorrow\u2019s internet users. We call this investing in demographic change.<\/p>\n The three key\/markets we explore are:<\/p>\n Right now, I\u2019m very interested in companies that touch the future of non-white collar work. A lot of innovation has been focused on the office worker, but I want to see more innovation around healthcare jobs, service workers and other non-office careers.<\/p>\n How do you prefer to be approached: a cold email, a warm intro or another method<\/strong><\/p>\n I want to hear from any founder building a company that will be accelerated by demographic change. How you reach me is up to you \u2013 just be prepared when you reach out to me to tell a concise, compelling story about the business you are building and why it matters. I can be reached on Twitter @moniquewoodard<\/a> and you can can also reach out on our website<\/a>.<\/p>\n Many laid-off engineers are launching their own startups: What are some of the skills\/experience you look for in nontechnical founders?<\/strong><\/p>\n I invest in the right person for the job and sometimes that is someone technical and sometimes it is not. The macroeconomic environment is leading many people to start companies who maybe would not have otherwise, and I think this is going to be a great thing. In lieu of technical skills, a great founder might have impressive sales skills \u2014 they will just have to know how to partner with a co-founder in order to get the product built.<\/p>\n The main thing I look for in founders is a big idea that can scale into a massive business, the ability to consistently execute and the resilience to get the business there.<\/p>\n In June 2023, what are some of the top questions founders should be asking investors?<\/strong><\/p>\n I think asking questions around expectations on company growth trajectory, communication cadence and how the investor can best support the company as it scales are really important.<\/p>\n What\u2019s a traditional pitch tactic that no longer works but is still a common practice? Are you open to reviewing pitch memos, or do you prefer a completed deck?<\/strong><\/p>\n Artificially engineered FOMO is out. Founders who withhold information to be mysterious and put an aggressive time clock on investor decision-making (e.g., \u201cwe\u2019re closing in three days\u201d) are usually deals I\u2019m going to pass on and I have never regretted that decision. Showing momentum is great, but I guard against being overly influenced by short timelines and the participation of other investors.<\/p>\n I will absolutely review a memo as long as it provides a full story and gives me an understanding of the business. Sometimes, memos do that better than decks.<\/p>\n Tell us about the best pitch you\u2019ve received recently: At what point in their presentation did you realize you were going to invest?<\/strong><\/p>\n The pitch I got from Jessica McGlory at Guaranteed was one of the most compelling conversations that I have had about the intersection of care and end of life. She was both mission-driven and dedicated to building a massive business in hospice care and the vision and thoughtfulness she showed in every conversation made me want to be on her team.<\/p>\n What are you reading\/watching\/listening to?<\/strong><\/p>\n I\u2019m reading \u201cPalo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism and the World\u201d by Malcom Harris<\/a> and listening to the new Jelly Roll album, \u201cWhitsitt Chapel.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n What kinds of investment opportunities are you looking for in June 2023?<\/strong><\/p>\n We are especially excited about the technical innovation happening across fintech, e-commerce enablement, climate tech, and AI. Additionally, given the different macro environment than during the COVID boom, we have seen that more and more seed-stage companies are approaching funding in a more deliberate fashion.<\/p>\n To us, this means raising more appropriate rounds of funding that enable their companies to find robust product-market fit without exorbitant cash burn. I think this environment is more healthy and ultimately fosters more disciplined and efficient startups.<\/p>\n How do you prefer to be approached: a cold email, a warm intro or another method?<\/strong><\/p>\n We want to speak to the best and brightest founders, regardless of if the introduction came from someone within our network or from cold outreach. With that being said, a warm introduction can help us cut through some of the noise, as we receive dozens of pitches each day.<\/p>\n
\nHow to pitch me: 10 investors discuss what they\u2019re looking for in June 2023<\/br>
\n2023-06-13 22:06:12<\/br><\/p>\n\n
\n
\nVivek Ramaswami, partner, Madrona<\/h2>\n
<\/strong>At Madrona, we invest from pre-seed to growth. Personally, I am excited about investing in Series A, B and C startups across B2B software, cloud infrastructure and AI\/ML. Of course there is plenty of excitement in generative AI today, and we\u2019ve made several investments in this space, but I believe there will continue to be great opportunities across the software stack that are either natively built on, or finding ways to leverage foundation models.<\/p>\n
<\/strong>I\u2019m always open to a cold email in the sector and geographic domains I focus in. A warm intro always helps, but I understand that not all founders will have an opportunity to get a warm intro. My email is vivek@madrona.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n
<\/strong>There is no reason why nontechnical founders can\u2019t be successful in starting their own companies.<\/p>\n
<\/strong>The range can be wide, as each case can be quite different (e.g., a second-time founder who raises again may be more comfortable with very little cash comp and more equity than a first-time founder, etc.). On average, when we look at the data we have, I would consider $130,000-$150,000 as a reasonable salary range for founders who have raised <$25 million and live in a \u201cTier 1\u201d city.<\/p>\n
<\/strong>Founders should be asking investors what specific sectors and stages they are investing in, because while funding was flowing freely in past years, it is less so today, and many investors are retrenching into the areas they know best. Additionally, founders should be looking at the track record of the firm, have they been able to successfully raise funds and do they reserve funds for follow-on rounds after the initial funding round.<\/p>\n
<\/strong>A pitch tactic I see that almost never works is having a banker cold email about a company that is completely irrelevant to the stage and sector that I look at. If anything, I would prefer the founder to reach out themselves and that way I can at least learn a bit more about the founder and it comes from a more authentic and genuine place.<\/p>\n
<\/strong>I can\u2019t name the company, but it was a growth-stage startup that started the presentation with the cold hard facts on the business: what scale they were at, how fast they were growing, their win rates against competitors and forward forecasts. They followed that up with what has both been going right and wrong in the business, but ultimately why they believe they are creating a generational business in a massive market, and why THEY were the right people to found the company.<\/p>\nMonique Woodard, managing director, Cake Ventures<\/h2>\n
\n
Adam Struck, founder and managing partner<\/span>, Struck Capital<\/h2>\n