wp-plugin-hostgator domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source:https:\/\/www.quantamagazine.org\/the-usefulness-of-a-memory-guides-where-the-brain-saves-it-20230830\/#comments<\/a><\/br> Scientists have recognized that memory formation is a multistage process since at least the early 1950s, in part from their studies of a patient named Henry Molaison \u2014 known for decades in the scientific literature only as H.M. Because he suffered from uncontrollable seizures that originated in his hippocampus, surgeons treated him by removing most of that brain structure. Afterward, the patient appeared quite normal in most respects: His vocabulary was intact; he retained his childhood memories and he remembered other details of his life from before the surgery. However, he always forgot the nurse taking care of him. During the decade that she cared for him, she had to introduce herself anew every morning. He had completely lost the ability to create new long-term memories.<\/p>\n Molaison\u2019s symptoms helped scientists discover that new memories first formed in the hippocampus and then were gradually transferred to the neocortex. For a while, it was widely assumed that this happened for all persistent memories. However, once researchers started seeing a growing number<\/a> of examples of memories that remained dependent on the hippocampus in the long term, it became clear that something else was going on.<\/p>\n To understand the reason behind this anomaly, the authors of the new paper turned to artificial neural networks, since the function of millions of intertwined neurons in the brain is unfathomably complicated. These networks are \u201can approximate idealization of biological neurons\u201d but are far simpler than the real thing, Saxe said. Like living neurons, they have layers of nodes that receive data, process it, and then provide weighted outputs to other layers of the network. Just as neurons influence each other through their synapses, the nodes in artificial neural networks adjust their activity levels based on inputs from other nodes.<\/p>\n The team linked three neural networks with different functions to develop a computational framework they called the teacher-notebook-student model. The teacher network represented the environment that an organism might find itself in; it provided inputs of experience. The notebook network represented the hippocampus, rapidly encoding all the details of every experience the teacher provided. The student network trained on the patterns from the teacher by consulting what was recorded in the notebook. \u201cThe goal of the student model is to find neurons \u2014 nodes \u2014 and learn connections [describing] how they could regenerate their pattern of activity,\u201d Fitzgerald said.<\/p>\n The repeated replays of memories from the notebook network entrained the student network to a general pattern through error correction. But the researchers also noticed an exception to the rule: If the student was trained on too many unpredictable memories \u2014 noisy signals that deviated too much from the rest \u2014 it degraded the student\u2019s ability to learn the generalized pattern.<\/p>\n From a logical standpoint, \u201cthis makes a lot of sense,\u201d Sun said. Imagine receiving packages at your house, he explained: If the package contains something useful for the future, \u201csuch as coffee mugs and dishes,\u201d it sounds reasonable to bring it into your home and keep it there permanently. But if the package contains a Spider-Man costume for a Halloween party or a brochure for a sale, there is no need to clutter the house with it. Those items can be stored separately or thrown away.<\/p>\n The study provides an interesting convergence between the systems used in artificial intelligence and those employed in modeling the brain. This is an instance where \u201cthe theory of those artificial systems gave some new conceptual ideas to think about memories in the brain,\u201d Saxe said.<\/p>\n There are parallels, for example, to how computerized facial recognition systems work. They may begin by prompting users to upload high-definition images of themselves from different angles. Connections within the neural network can piece together a general conception of what the face looks like from different angles and with different expressions. But if you happen to upload a photo \u201ccontaining face of your friend in it, then the system is unable to identify a predictable facial mapping between the two,\u201d Fitzgerald said. It damages generalization and makes the system less accurate at recognizing the normal face.<\/p>\n These images activate specific input neurons, and activity then flows through the network, adjusting connection weights. With more images, the model further adjusts the connection weights between nodes to minimize output errors.<\/p>\n But just because an experience is unusual and doesn\u2019t fit into a generalization, that doesn\u2019t mean that it should be discarded and forgotten. To the contrary, it can be vitally important to remember exceptional experiences. That seems to be why the brain sorts its memories into different categories that are stored separately, with the neocortex used for reliable generalizations and the hippocampus for exceptions.<\/p>\n This kind of research raises awareness about the \u201cfallibility of human memory,\u201d McClelland said. Memory is a finite resource, and biology has had to compromise to make the best use of the limited resources. Even the hippocampus does not contain a perfect record of experiences. Each time an experience is recalled, there are changes in the connection weights of the network, causing memory elements to get more averaged out. It raises questions about the circumstances under which \u201ceyewitness testimony [could] be protected from bias and influence from repeated onslaughts of queries,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n The model may also offer insights into more fundamental questions. \u201cHow do we build up reliable knowledge and make informed decisions?\u201d said James Antony<\/a>, a neuroscientist at California Polytechnic State University who was not involved in the study. It shows the importance of evaluating memories to make reliable predictions \u2014 a lot of noisy data or unreliable information may be as unsuitable for training humans as it is for training AI models.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/br><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n
\nThe Usefulness of a Memory Guides Where the Brain Saves It<\/br>
\n2023-08-31 21:59:03<\/br><\/p>\n