wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source:https:\/\/www.quantamagazine.org\/what-makes-life-tick-mitochondria-may-keep-time-for-cells-20230918\/#comments<\/a><\/br> So far, these mechanisms across systems and scales \u2014 in the developing embryo\u2019s segmentation clock, in a single developing neuron, and in more fundamental protein machinery \u2014 have all continued to beat in time.<\/p>\n \u201cPretty much everything we looked at so far is scaling,\u201d Pourqui\u00e9 said, \u201cwhich means that there is a global command for all these processes.\u201d<\/p>\n What could this upstream control system be? Pourqui\u00e9 and Diaz Cuadros pondered which system could potentially affect a variety of cellular processes \u2014 and they landed on metabolism, driven by mitochondria. Mitochondria produce ATP, the energy currency of the cell, as well as a host of metabolites essential for building proteins and DNA, regulating the genome, and performing other critical processes.<\/p>\n To test that idea, they devised genetic and pharmacological methods to speed up and then slow down the metabolic rates of their stem cells. If mitochondria were indeed setting the cellular tempo, they expected to see their experiments alter the rhythm of the segmentation clock.<\/p>\n When they slowed metabolism in human cells, the segmentation clock slowed too: Its period stretched<\/a> from five to seven hours, and the rate of protein synthesis slowed as well. And when they sped metabolism up, the clock\u2019s oscillations accelerated, too.<\/p>\n It was as if they had discovered the tuning knob of the cell\u2019s internal metronome, which let them accelerate or decelerate the tempo of embryonic development. \u201cIt\u2019s not differences in the gene regulatory architecture that explains these differences in timing,\u201d Pourqui\u00e9 said. The findings were published in <\/a>Nature <\/i>earlier this year.<\/span><\/p>\n This metabolic tuning knob wasn\u2019t limited to the developing embryo. Iwata and Vanderhaeghen, meanwhile, figured out how to use drugs and genetics to toy with the metabolic tempo of maturing neurons \u2014 a process that, unlike that of the segmentation clock, which runs for only a couple of days, takes many weeks or months. When mouse neurons were compelled to generate energy more slowly, the neurons matured more slowly, too. Conversely, by pharmacologically shifting human neurons toward a faster pathway, the researchers could accelerate their maturation. The findings were published in Science<\/em> in January<\/a>.<\/p>\n To Vanderhaeghen, the conclusion of their experiments is clear: \u201cMetabolic rate is driving developmental timing.\u201d<\/p>\n Yet, even if metabolism is the upstream regulator of all other cellular processes, those differences must come back to genetic regulation. It\u2019s possible that mitochondria influence the timing of the expression of developmental genes or those involved in the machinery for making, maintaining and recycling proteins.<\/p>\n One possibility, Vanderhaeghen speculated, is that metabolites from the mitochondria are essential to the process that condenses or expands folded DNA in genomes so that it can be transcribed to build proteins. Maybe, he suggested, those metabolites limit the rate of transcription and globally set the pace at which gene regulatory networks are turned on and off. That\u2019s just one idea, however, that needs experimental unpacking.<\/p>\n There is also the question of what makes mitochondria tick in the first place. Diaz Cuadros thinks that the answer must lie in DNA: \u201cSomewhere in their genome, there has to be a sequence difference between mouse and human that is encoding that difference in developmental rate.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWe still have no idea where that difference is,\u201d she said. \u201cWe\u2019re unfortunately still very far from that.\u201d<\/p>\n Finding that answer may take time, and like the mitochondrial clock, scientific progress proceeds at a tempo all its own.<\/p>\n Correction:<\/strong> September 18, 2023<\/em> <\/br><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n
\nWhat Makes Life Tick? Mitochondria May Keep Time for Cells<\/br>
\n2023-09-19 21:59:04<\/br><\/p>\nThe Tick-Tock of Metabolism<\/h2>\n
In the introduction, a sentence was revised to clarify that it is the rate of gene expression, not overall metabolic rate, that helps to direct the tempo of development. The article was also updated to correct which species in the stem cell zoo have the fastest and slowest segmentation-clock oscillations.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n