wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source:https:\/\/www.quantamagazine.org\/behold-modular-forms-the-fifth-fundamental-operation-of-math-20230921\/#comments<\/a><\/br> Two kinds of transformations copy the fundamental domain to the right and left, as well as to a series of ever-shrinking semicircles along the horizontal axis. These copies fill the entire upper half of the complex plane.<\/p>\n A modular form relates the copies to each other in a very particular way. That\u2019s where its symmetries enter the picture.<\/p>\n If you can move from a point in one copy to a point in another through the first kind of transformation \u2014 by shifting one unit to the left or right \u2014 then the modular form assigns the same value to those two points. Just as the values of the cosine function repeat in intervals of $latex 2pi$, a modular form is periodic in one-unit intervals.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, you can get from a point in one copy to a point in another through the second type of transformation \u2014 by reflecting over the boundary of the circle with radius 1 centered at the origin. In this case, the modular form doesn\u2019t necessarily assign those points the same value. However, the values at the two points relate to each other in a regular way that also gives rise to symmetry.<\/p>\n You can combine these transformations in infinitely many ways, which gives you the infinitely many symmetry conditions that the modular form must satisfy.<\/p>\n \u201cThat doesn\u2019t necessarily sound very exciting,\u201d said John Voight<\/a>, a mathematician at Dartmouth College. \u201cI mean, carving up the upper half-plane and putting numbers on various places \u2014 who cares?\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cBut they\u2019re very elemental,\u201d he added. And there\u2019s a reason why that\u2019s the case.<\/p>\n In the 1920s and \u201930s, the German mathematician Erich Hecke developed a deeper theory around modular forms. Crucially, he realized that they exist in certain spaces \u2014 spaces with specific dimensions and other properties. He figured out how to describe these spaces concretely and use them to relate different modular forms to one another.<\/p>\n This realization has driven a lot of 20th- and 21st-century mathematics.<\/p>\n To understand how, first consider an old question: How many ways can you write a given integer as the sum of four squares? There is only one way to write zero, for instance, while there are eight ways to express 1, 24 ways to express 2, and 32 ways to express 3. To study this sequence \u2014 1, 8, 24, 32 and so on \u2014 mathematicians encoded it in an infinite sum called a generating function:<\/p>\n $latex 1 + 8q + {{24q}^2} + {{32q}^3} + {{24q}^4} + {{48q}^5} + \u2026$<\/p>\n There wasn\u2019t necessarily a way to know what the coefficient of, say, $latex q^{174}$ should be \u2014 that was precisely the question they were trying to answer. But by converting the sequence into a generating function, mathematicians could apply tools from calculus and other fields to infer information about it. They might, for instance, be able to come up with a way to approximate the value of any coefficient.<\/p>\n But it turns out that if the generating function is a modular form, you can do much better: You can get your hands on an exact formula for every coefficient.<\/p>\n \u201cIf you know it\u2019s a modular form, then you know everything,\u201d said Jan Bruinier<\/a> of the Technical University of Darmstadt in Germany.<\/p>\n That\u2019s because the infinitely many symmetries of the modular form aren\u2019t just beautiful to look at \u2014 \u201cthey\u2019re so constraining,\u201d said Larry Rolen<\/a> of Vanderbilt University, that they can be made into \u201ca tool for automatically proving congruences and identities between things.\u201d<\/p>\n Mathematicians and physicists often encode questions of interest in generating functions. They might want to count the number of points on special curves, or the number of states in certain physical systems. \u201cIf we are lucky, then it is a modular form,\u201d said Claudia Alfes-Neumann<\/a>, a mathematician at Bielefeld University in Germany. That can be very difficult to prove, but if you can, then \u201cthe theory of modular forms is so rich that it gives you tons of possibilities to investigate these [series] coefficients.\u201d<\/p>\n Any modular form is going to look very complicated. Some of the simplest \u2014 which are used as building blocks for other modular forms \u2014\u00a0are called Eisenstein series.<\/p>\n You can think of an Eisenstein series as an infinite sum of functions. To determine each of those functions, use the points on an infinite 2D grid:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/br><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n
\nBehold Modular Forms, the \u2018Fifth Fundamental Operation\u2019 of Math<\/br>
\n2023-09-25 21:58:22<\/br><\/p>\nControlled Spaces <\/strong><\/h2>\n
Building Blocks<\/strong><\/h2>\n