wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source:https:\/\/www.quantamagazine.org\/the-often-overlooked-experiment-that-revealed-the-quantum-world-20231205\/#comments<\/a><\/br> Once the experiment was running, producing any legible result was still a challenge. The collector plate was only a fraction of the size of a nail head, so reading the patterns in the silver deposit required a microscope. Perhaps apocryphally, the scientists inadvertently helped themselves out with questionable laboratory etiquette: The silver deposit would have been invisible if it weren\u2019t for the smoke trickling in from their cigars, which \u2014\u00a0because of their low salaries \u2014\u00a0were inexpensive and rich in sulfur that helped the silver develop into visible jet-black silver sulfide. (In 2003, Friedrich and a colleague reenacted this episode<\/a> and confirmed that the silver signal appeared only in the presence of cheap cigar smoke.)<\/p>\n After many months of troubleshooting, Gerlach spent the entire night of February 7, 1922, shooting silver at the detector. The next morning, he and colleagues developed the plate and struck gold<\/a>: a silver deposit neatly split in two, like a kiss from the quantum realm. Gerlach documented the result in a microphotograph and shipped it as a postcard to Bohr, along with the message: \u201cWe congratulate you on the confirmation of your theory.\u201d<\/p>\n The finding shook the physics community. Albert Einstein called<\/a> it \u201cthe most interesting achievement at this point\u201d and nominated the team for a Nobel Prize. Isidor Rabi<\/a> said the experiment \u201cconvinced me once and for all that \u2026 quantum phenomena required a completely new orientation.\u201d Stern\u2019s dreams of impugning quantum theory had obviously backfired, though he did not hold to his promise of quitting physics;\u00a0instead, he won<\/a> a Nobel Prize in 1943 for a subsequent discovery. \u201cI still have objections to the \u2026 beauty of quantum mechanics,\u201d Stern said, \u201cbut she is correct.\u201d<\/p>\n Today, physicists recognize that Stern and Gerlach were right in interpreting their experiment as a corroboration of the still-nascent quantum theory. But they were right for the wrong reason. The scientists assumed that a silver atom\u2019s split trajectory is defined by the orbit of its outermost electron, which is fixed at certain angles. In reality, the splitting is due to the quantization of the electron\u2019s internal angular momentum \u2014 a quantity known as spin, which wouldn\u2019t be discovered for a few more years. Serendipitously, the interpretation worked out because the researchers were saved by what Friedrich calls a \u201cstrange coincidence, this conspiracy of nature\u201d: Two yet-unknown properties of the electron \u2014 its spin and its anomalous magnetic moment \u2014 happened to cancel out.<\/p>\n The textbook explanation of the Stern-Gerlach experiment holds that as the silver atom travels, the electron isn\u2019t spin-up or spin-down. It\u2019s in a quantum mixture or \u201csuperposition\u201d of those states. The atom takes both paths simultaneously. Only upon smashing into the detector is its state measured, its path fixed.<\/p>\n But starting in the 1930s, many prominent theorists opted for an interpretation that required less quantum magic. The argument held that the magnetic field effectively measures each electron and defines its spin. The idea that each atom takes both paths at once is absurd and unnecessary, these critics argued.<\/p>\n In theory, these two hypotheses could be tested. If each atom really did traverse the magnetic field with two personas, then it should be possible \u2014 theoretically \u2014 to recombine those ghostly identities. Doing so would generate a particular interference pattern on a detector when they realigned \u2014\u00a0an indication that the atom indeed navigated both routes.<\/p>\n The grand challenge is that, to preserve superposition and generate that final interference signal, the personas must be split so smoothly and quickly that the two separated entities have wholly indistinguishable histories, no knowledge of the other, and no way of telling which path they took. In the 1980s, multiple theorists determined that splitting and recombining the electron\u2019s identities with such perfection would be as unfeasible as reconstructing Humpty Dumpty<\/a> after his great fall from the wall.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/br><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n
\nThe (Often) Overlooked Experiment That Revealed the Quantum World<\/br>
\n2023-12-06 21:58:18<\/br><\/p>\nThe Spin of Silver<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Cracking Eggs<\/strong><\/h2>\n