wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source:https:\/\/www.quantamagazine.org\/fresh-x-rays-reveal-a-universe-as-clumpy-as-cosmology-predicts-20240304\/#comments<\/a><\/br> The eRosita team, however, found no such discrepancy. \u201cOur result was basically in line with the prediction from the very early time, from the CMB,\u201d said Vittorio Ghirardini<\/a>, who led the analysis. He and his colleagues calculated an S<\/em>8<\/sub> of 0.85.<\/p>\n Some team members were disappointed, Ghirardini said, since hinting at missing ingredients was a more exciting prospect than matching the known theory.<\/p>\n The S8<\/sub> value sitting a tad higher than the CMB estimate will likely trigger more analysis from other teams, said Gerrit Schellenberger<\/a>, an astrophysicist who studies galaxy clusters at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. \u201cI believe it\u2019s probably not the last paper we have seen on that topic.\u201d<\/p>\n Copious neutrinos formed in the early universe \u2014 nearly as many as photons (particles of light), said Marilena Loverde<\/a>, a cosmologist at the University of Washington. But physicists know that neutrinos, unlike photons, must have tiny masses<\/a> because of how they oscillate between three types. The particles don\u2019t acquire mass through the same mechanism as other elementary particles, so their mass is a much-studied mystery. And the first question is how massive they actually are.<\/p>\n Cosmologists can estimate the mass of neutrinos by studying their effects on the structure of the cosmos. Neutrinos zip around at nearly the speed of light and pass right through other matter rather than glomming onto it. So their presence in the cosmos has attenuated its clumpiness. \u201cThe more mass you put on neutrinos, the more of the mass that is smooth on those [large] scales,\u201d Loverde said.<\/p>\n Combining their galaxy cluster measurements with CMB measurements, the eRosita team estimated that the sum of the masses of the three types of neutrinos is no more than 0.11 electron volts (eV), or less than a millionth of the mass of an electron. Other neutrino experiments have established a lower bound<\/a>, showing that the three neutrino masses must add up to at least 0.06 eV (for one possible ordering of the three mass values) or 0.1 eV (for the inverted order). As the distance shrinks between the upper and lower bounds, scientists are getting closer to pinpointing the value of the neutrino mass. \u201cWe are actually at the brink of making a breakthrough,\u201d Bulbul said. In subsequent data releases, the eRosita team could push down the upper bound enough to rule out the inverted-order neutrino mass models.<\/p>\n Caution is warranted. Any other speedy, lightweight particles that might exist \u2014 such as axions<\/a>, hypothetical particles proposed as candidates for dark matter \u2014 would have the same effects on structure formation. And they would introduce errors into the neutrino mass measurement.<\/p>\n Galaxy cluster measurements can reveal not just how structures grew, but also how their growth was impeded by dark energy \u2014 the thin glaze of repulsive energy that permeates space, accelerating space\u2019s expansion and thereby separating matter.<\/p>\n If dark energy is the energy of space itself, as the standard model of cosmology assumes, then it will have a constant density throughout space and time (that\u2019s why it\u2019s sometimes referred to as the cosmological constant). But if its density is instead dropping over time, then it\u2019s something else entirely. \u201cThat\u2019s the biggest question that cosmology has,\u201d said Sebastian Grandis, an eRosita team member at the University of Innsbruck in Austria.<\/p>\n From their map of thousands of clusters, the researchers found that dark energy matches the profile of a cosmological constant, although their measurement has a 10% uncertainty, so an ever-so-slightly varying dark energy density remains possible.<\/p>\n Originally, eRosita, which sits aboard a Russian spacecraft, was to conduct eight full-sky surveys, but in February 2022, weeks after the telescope began its fifth survey, Russia invaded Ukraine. In response, the German side of the collaboration, which operates and runs eRosita, put the telescope into safe mode, ceasing all scientific observations.<\/p>\n These initial papers draw from just the first six months of data. The German group expects to find about four times as many galaxy clusters in the additional 1.5 years of observations, which will allow all these cosmological parameters to be pinpointed with more accuracy. \u201cCluster cosmology could be the most sensitive probe of cosmology other than the CMB,\u201d said Anja von der Linden<\/a>, an astrophysicist at Stony Brook University.<\/p>\n Their initial results demonstrate the power of a relatively untapped information source. \u201cWe\u2019re kind of the new kid on the block,\u201d Grandis said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/br><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n
\nFresh X-Rays Reveal a Universe as Clumpy as Cosmology Predicts<\/br>
\n2024-03-05 21:58:10<\/br><\/p>\nWeighing Neutrinos<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Tracking Dark Energy <\/strong><\/h2>\n