wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source:https:\/\/www.quantamagazine.org\/tiny-tweaks-to-neurons-can-rewire-animal-motion-20240311\/#comments<\/a><\/br> It was as if this ion channel were a dial that could twist one neuron type into the other. But what was actually different about this protein in the snake\u2019s body and rattle?<\/p>\n At first, the researchers thought that rattle motor neurons must have extra KV72\/3<\/sub> potassium channels. If the rattle neurons had more channels, the scientists figured, then they could discharge ions more quickly, bringing the voltage back down to prepare the channels to quickly fire again.<\/p>\n To find out, Bothe and Chagnaud extracted and sequenced RNA from both types of rattlesnake motor neurons and sent the data to Jason Gallant<\/a>, an evolutionary biologist at Michigan State University, so he could compare the expression of the KV72\/3<\/sub> channel gene between the two tissues. The gene for KV72\/3<\/sub> channels is the same in every cell of the animal\u2019s body \u2014 but if the rattle neurons had more KV72\/3<\/sub> channels, the researchers would expect to see higher gene expression in that tissue.<\/p>\n Alas, their simple explanation was not proved out. \u201cThere really is no difference in the level of gene expression in these potassium channels, which was disappointing,\u201d Gallant said. \u201cBut I think it opens up a more realistic view of biology.\u201d<\/p>\n Variations in the gene\u2019s expression would have provided a simple, open-and-shut way to explain how the evolutionary screws on rattlesnake motor neurons are adjusted. But biology offers other possibilities. Chagnaud and Bothe speculated that after the channel proteins are constructed from the genetic blueprint, they could be modified into slightly different forms that manage ions differently. More research will be needed to pin down the details \u2014 to find the control that adjusts the control.<\/p>\n For his part, Katz didn\u2019t consider the result disappointing at all. \u201cSo they didn\u2019t see a [change in] gene expression. That was the answer they expected,\u201d he said. \u201cBut the fact is that that\u2019s a cool result.\u201d<\/p>\n For many decades, researchers have assumed that motor circuits \u201cexist as they will be used,\u201d Katz said \u2014 meaning that initiating a behavior like walking or swimming is simply a matter of turning on the right circuit. In this view, evolving a new behavior would require an entirely new circuit layout. But in studies of organisms as diverse as crustaceans<\/a>, sea slugs<\/a> and now possibly snakes, researchers are finding that interactions with neuromodulators<\/a> and other chemicals can modulate the activity that a circuit evokes, leading the same networks of cells to produce markedly different behaviors.<\/p>\n The new study, Katz said, hints that playing with this plasticity could be a way that new movement behaviors evolve. Perhaps the difference between rattle and body behavior has something to do with subtle differences in their cells\u2019 chemical environments, not the structure or expression of the ion channel itself.<\/p>\n \u201cFor a lot of evolutionary modifications, your primary goal is to not break the animal, right?\u201d Bagnall said. \u201cAnything that you can do that tunes traits without becoming an on\/off switch is a powerful means of driving change without being deeply deleterious.\u201d<\/p>\n This new study shows that it\u2019s possible to tune motor neurons for wildly different behaviors by tweaking a single protein. But motor neurons are just one piece of the movement puzzle. They\u2019re the last link in a chain that begins with circuits in the central nervous system known as central pattern generators, which generate the rhythmic patterns involved in walking or swimming. Those upstream circuits are better understood in other organisms, like zebra fish. In rattlesnakes, puzzling them out would be a next logical step.<\/p>\n \u201cThe number-one missing link,\u201d Katz said, \u201cis how do you create the frequency for the rattle? Where does that come from?\u201d<\/p>\n Chagnaud is eager to find out if a similar Stellschraube tunes motor neurons in another species feared for its bite. Like rattlesnakes, piranhas execute two rhythmic movements with radically different frequencies: swimming, with a frequency of up to six cycles per second, and vibrating their swim bladders at frequencies of up to 140 cycles per second to make noises that sound like barks, yips and drumbeats. However, unlike rattlesnakes, piranhas use the same section of their spine to control both movement types.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m curious to know, will it be KV72\/3<\/sub>? We have no idea,\u201d Chagnaud said. \u201cDid evolution find the same solution to the same problem?\u201d<\/p>\n He has his doubts. Although he\u2019s hopeful about finding a similar mechanism, the surprising \u2014 and at times frustrating \u2014 discovery in rattlesnakes \u201cwas an eye-opener,\u201d he said. Evolution is not a human designer with a goal in mind. Its methods are mysterious, and its toolbox is vast. \u201cAnd you have very different screws that you can turn.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/br><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n
\nTiny Tweaks to Neurons Can Rewire Animal Motion<\/br>
\n2024-03-12 21:58:13<\/br><\/p>\nTurning and Tuning<\/strong><\/h2>\n