wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source: https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/23043232\/cnn-plus-axios-chat-shut-down-streaming-news<\/a> Now that CNN has made the decision to shut down<\/a> its new streaming baby CNN Plus less than a month after it went live, you might be wondering what went wrong. A report<\/a> from Axios has a chart that shows the streaming service was far from reaching its projected year-end viewership goal, and would have burned through $400 million in 2022 alone to try to get there. <\/p>\n CNN projected that the service would have two million subscribers by the end of the year, but around two weeks later, they found they\u2019d only managed to attract 150,000 people. At first, this doesn\u2019t sound too bad, but considering services like Disney Plus had 10 million subscribers<\/a> in its first day \u2014 and that Quibi, which was similarly shut down early in life<\/a>, saw 910,000 people sign up in its first few days \u2014 this wasn\u2019t a lot for CNN. <\/p>\n Streaming isn\u2019t for everyone, but CNN was setting itself up to make a lot of money. CNN Plus was supposed to make a profit of $800 million per year by 2030, an even bigger cash cow than its cable network is today (which makes about $500 million in annual profit, Axios estimates). <\/p>\n
\n
<\/br><\/code><\/p>\n