wp-plugin-hostgator domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source: https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2022\/4\/30\/23049490\/pixel-watch-leaked-battery-specs-cellular-models-flagship<\/a> It sounds like Google\u2019s upcoming Pixel Watch will be a flagship set to compete with Samsung\u2019s latest Galaxy Watches<\/a> and the Apple Watch, according to new specs leaked by 9to5Google<\/em><\/a>. According to 9to5<\/em>\u2019s report, you\u2019ll be able to get a cellular version of the wearable, and it will have a 300 milliamp-hour (mAh) battery.<\/p>\n It wasn\u2019t necessarily a given that there would be a cellular option for the Pixel Watch. Some lower-end smartwatches<\/a>, and even some high-end fitness-focused models<\/a>, are reliant on your phone for connectivity. If the rumor is accurate and there is a cellular Pixel Watch model, it reinforces the idea that Google\u2019s probably not trying to make its watch a smaller or cheaper alternative \u2014 it wants that mass-market appeal. <\/p>\n As for the battery, its physical capacity seems about right for how big the watch is. However, it\u2019s almost impossible to tell what that milliamp-hour rating means for how long it\u2019ll last between charges. <\/p>\n When The Verge<\/em>\u2019s reviews editor Dan Seifert compared the Apple Watch Series 7 41mm and the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic 42mm, he found that they had dramatically different levels of endurance. One day, the Galaxy Watch was out of juice<\/a> while the Apple Watch was at 52 percent (though the next day he was able to get a couple of hours more<\/a> out of the Galaxy after some tweaks). And yet the Apple Watch\u2019s battery isn\u2019t that <\/em>much bigger; it has a 284mAh capacity, while the Galaxy\u2019s battery is rated for 247mAh. <\/p>\n 8:05pm<\/p>\n Galaxy Watch 4: 0% dead and shutdown<\/p>\n Apple Watch Series 7: 52%<\/p>\n \u2014 Dan S. (@dcseifert) April 7, 2022<\/a>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n What really matters when it comes to a wearable\u2019s battery life are its features and processor. Both are unknown at this point for the Pixel Watch, though features-wise it obviously won\u2019t have the e-paper display that let the Pebble Time<\/a> get well over a week of use out of its 250mAh battery. <\/p>\n The big, as-of-yet unanswered question is which chip Google will use \u2014 Qualcomm\u2019s Snapdragon Wear 4100 or 4100 Plus, which haven\u2019t shown up in a lot of watches<\/a> despite having been around for a while<\/a>? A currently unannounced next-gen Qualcomm chip<\/a>? Samsung\u2019s Exynos chips that it uses in its own watches<\/a>? A custom Tensor processor<\/a>, like Google uses in the Pixel 6? There are so many options \u2014 some of which are unknowns, and others that would be a bad sign for its battery life. <\/p>\n Hopefully, we won\u2019t have to wait too long to find out the answer \u2014 the rumors say that Google could announce the Pixel Watch at its I\/O conference, which starts just a few weeks from now on May 11th<\/a>. If you want to get a look at its hardware before then, though, you\u2019re in luck \u2014 someone posted a plethora of pictures of it on<\/a> and off<\/a> a wrist, claiming that a friend found the device laying around in a bar, iPhone 4-style<\/a>. Maybe Sundar Pichai will make the same joke as Steve Jobs<\/a> when he announces the Pixel Watch, saying \u201cstop me if you\u2019ve already seen this.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
<\/br><\/code><\/p>\n\n