wp-plugin-hostgator domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source: https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2022\/5\/2\/23054193\/twitter-edit-button-how-it-works-looks-like<\/a> Twitter\u2019s edit button has been a joke for longer than I can remember, but it\u2019s finally officially becoming a reality<\/a> \u2014 and Jane Manchun Wong, who makes it her mission to find hidden features in companies\u2019 code, has just given us our first real glimpse at what it might look like. <\/p>\n As you\u2019d expect, the editing part is pretty simple: you press a button called \u201cEdit Tweet\u201d in the drop-down context menu, and then you can edit a tweet. Currently, it looks like you\u2019ll get 30 minutes after you publish a tweet to hit that button; it\u2019ll open a window with your entire original content laid out in front of you, and you can publish whatever you like \u2014 delete the whole thing and start over if you want. It\u2019s not just for typos. <\/p>\n the current unreleased version of Edit Tweet reuploads media (images, videos, GIFs, etc) instead of reusing them. an inefficient use of the bandwidth and media processing power, might be lossy too. plus it turns my video into an image (mishandling media type) pic.twitter.com\/HjoIA0CZhO<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 Jane Manchun Wong (@wongmjane) May 2, 2022<\/a>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n The bigger question, of course, is what happens afterward \u2014 how can readers tell if you messed with your tweets after the fact and what you messed with? That\u2019s also fairly simple: there\u2019s a little \u201cEdited\u201d button that\u2019ll show up next to the timestamp, and you can click it to go to an Edit History page that should theoretically show all the previous versions of that tweet. <\/p>\n (Ignore the \u201cedit: soup\u201d bit in the tweet above, Wong added that for dramatic effect.)<\/em><\/p>\n Importantly, as Wong mentioned a few weeks back<\/a>, Twitter appears to be making each individual tweet immutable \u2014 every version has its own ID, none of them get deleted, and it\u2019s not clear whether Twitter\u2019s backend will automatically propagate the newest version across the web. If you\u2019re, say, reading a Verge<\/em> story with an old embedded that got rewritten, will you now see the new tweet or the old one? Unclear! <\/p>\n But even if you\u2019re looking at the old, unedited version of the tweet, Twitter will tip you off about that. See the \u201cThere\u2019s a new version of this Tweet\u201d below? If you click that, it should take you to the newest version right away.<\/p>\n Sum it up, and Wong tells me she thinks it\u2019ll probably <\/em>work this way:<\/p>\n trump originally tweets \u201ccovefe\u201d, the tweets get ID #1, people embed the ID #1<\/p>\n then trump creates a new edit \u201ccoffee\u201d, the new edit (technically a new tweet) gets ID #2, while the original tweet (#1) becomes the first version of the Tweet<\/p>\n and then in the embedded tweet which still points to #1, now shows \u201cthere\u2019s a new version of this Tweet\u201d indicator<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Makes sense to me. And it sure sounds a lot like the solution that Verge<\/em> contributing editor Casey Newton suggested<\/a> in 2017: <\/p>\n I propose an option in a tweet\u2019s inverted-caret drop-down menu that reads thus: \u201cedit tweet.\u201d Tap it and you can correct any mistake and republish. The new version is served across Twitter wherever the tweet exists, including retweets and quote-tweets. Next to the tweet\u2019s timestamp, a prominent new word appears: \u201cedited.\u201d Tap the word and Twitter displays the previous versions of the tweet underneath the latest one.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Except here, it sounds like Edit History may be a different page<\/a> rather than neatly unrolling underneath. <\/p>\n Keep in mind that Wong hasn\u2019t been able to publish any completed, edited tweets to Twitter\u2019s actual backend quite yet, so these findings are very <\/em>tentative. She sleuthed it all out by running the app client-side, letting her see the user interface in action.<\/p>\n
\n
<\/br><\/code><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n