Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wp-plugin-hostgator domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the ol-scrapes domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893
{"id":5329,"date":"2022-05-07T14:42:49","date_gmt":"2022-05-07T14:42:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2022\/05\/07\/adding-physical-buttons-to-fitbits-next-gen-devices-is-a-smart-idea\/"},"modified":"2022-05-07T14:42:51","modified_gmt":"2022-05-07T14:42:51","slug":"adding-physical-buttons-to-fitbits-next-gen-devices-is-a-smart-idea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2022\/05\/07\/adding-physical-buttons-to-fitbits-next-gen-devices-is-a-smart-idea\/","title":{"rendered":"Adding physical buttons to Fitbit\u2019s next-gen devices is a smart idea"},"content":{"rendered":"

Source: https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2022\/5\/6\/23058971\/fitbit-garmin-fitness-tracker-buttons-watch<\/a>
\n
<\/br><\/code><\/p>\n

\n

To button, or not to button? When it comes to wearables, the answer is you should always opt for physical buttons. And while they\u2019re abundant on smartwatches, fitness trackers tend to favor touchscreens and capacitive buttons. But it looks like there may be some good news for fans of physical buttons. A new leaked photo of the Fitbit Versa 4 indicates that the side button is back, baby.<\/p>\n

The photo comes from 9to5Google<\/em><\/a>, and for the most part, it looks almost identical to the Versa 3 \u2014 except if you zero in on the right-hand side, where you can see a teeny little raised button. <\/p>\n

It might not seem like it, but this is actually a significant design change. Earlier iterations of the Versa \u2014 one of Fitbit\u2019s most popular devices \u2014 had a physical side button. Then, with the Versa 3 in 2020, Fitbit did away with it in favor of a smooth indentation. This was technically a \u201cbutton,\u201d but it wasn\u2019t something you could actually press in a traditional sense. Instead, when you squeezed it correctly, the Versa 3 would vibrate. The Fitbit Sense<\/a>, which came out the same year, also shared the same design.<\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\"\"<\/p>\n

<\/source><\/picture>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

You can see a tiny little button on the right-hand side of this purported Fitbit Versa 4.<\/em><\/figcaption>Image: 9to5Google<\/em><\/cite><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n

On the surface, this seemed sensible. In theory, no buttons meant no accidental presses and a sleeker profile. In reality, it made for a crappy user experience. <\/p>\n

If you use too little pressure on the Sense or Versa 3\u2019s button, it won\u2019t do anything. And if you use too much pressure, it still might not do anything. Or, instead of waking the screen as you intended, you might end up triggering the long-press shortcut instead. For whatever reason, the top half of the button tended to be more responsive than the bottom. If you peruse Fitbit<\/a> and<\/a> Reddit<\/a> forums<\/a>, you\u2019ll find plenty of customers griping and sharing tips on how to make this button work. <\/p>\n

This isn\u2019t a new problem. There are plenty of fitness trackers that don\u2019t have any<\/em> kind of button or crown. Instead, they rely on touchscreens entirely. For instance, with the Garmin Vivosmart 3 and Vivosmart 4, you had to tap the screen to confirm your choices. That meant nailing the perfect cadence and pressure each time. If you didn\u2019t master it, it meant a simple two-second task could end up taking several minutes to figure out. And while the Garmin Vivosmart devices are the example I\u2019m using here, there are several touchscreen-only fitness bands out there with the same problems.<\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\"\"<\/p>\n

<\/source><\/picture>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

This button on the Garmin Vivosmart 5 took a good product and made it great.<\/em><\/figcaption>Photo by Victoria Song \/ The Verge<\/cite><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n

Sweaty fingers are also an issue. Touchscreens often don\u2019t register moist fingers, and they also make it harder to use capacitive buttons. The irony is these are devices meant to be worn while exercising, so they effectively become harder to use just when you need them most.<\/p>\n

A well-designed physical button is a simple solution to all these problems. When you see a physical button, you don\u2019t have to learn how to use it. You just press and it does the thing you want. If you want to get fancy, you can program nifty shortcuts \u2014 like pausing your music \u2014 and never have to look down at your watch. A physical button does not care how sweaty your fingers are. It will always do its job. <\/p>\n

\n