Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wp-plugin-hostgator domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the ol-scrapes domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893
{"id":615,"date":"2022-03-02T15:31:09","date_gmt":"2022-03-02T15:31:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2022\/03\/02\/former-nuclear-regulatory-commission-chair-argues-nuclear-power-isnt-a-climate-solution\/"},"modified":"2022-03-02T15:31:10","modified_gmt":"2022-03-02T15:31:10","slug":"former-nuclear-regulatory-commission-chair-argues-nuclear-power-isnt-a-climate-solution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/scienceandnerds.com\/2022\/03\/02\/former-nuclear-regulatory-commission-chair-argues-nuclear-power-isnt-a-climate-solution\/","title":{"rendered":"Former Nuclear Regulatory Commission chair argues nuclear power isn\u2019t a climate solution"},"content":{"rendered":"

Source: https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2022\/1\/27\/22904943\/nuclear-power-climate-change-solution-gregory-jaczko<\/a>
\n
<\/br><\/code><\/p>\n

\n

Former heads of nuclear regulatory bodies across Europe and the US put out a statement<\/a> this week voicing their opposition to nuclear energy as a climate solution. <\/p>\n

The debate over the benefits and risks of nuclear energy has been polarizing for years, but it\u2019s escalating as world leaders work to transition from fossil fuels to clean energy. On one side of the debate, some argue that renewables alone are too dependent on the weather to provide a consistent power supply. Nuclear technology, which today provides about half of America\u2019s carbon-free electricity, can reliably back it up, they say. And new nuclear technology is unlikely to trigger disasters like those at Chernobyl and Fukushima that have frightened the public in the past, proponents argue. But not everyone is convinced. <\/p>\n

Nuclear energy is still too costly and risky to be a viable clean energy source, the authors of the statement write. They include Gregory Jaczko, former chairman of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the former leads of similar agencies in Germany, France, and the UK. <\/p>\n

To learn more about why some nuclear power experts oppose the energy source as a climate fix, The Verge<\/em> spoke with Jaczko, who chaired the NRC from 2009 to 2012 and, since then, has been outspoken<\/a> about his concerns. <\/p>\n

\n