wp-plugin-hostgator
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ol-scrapes
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/scienrds/scienceandnerds/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Source: https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2022\/6\/27\/23184743\/apple-qualcomm-patent-lawsuit-supreme-court-5g-modems<\/a> The Supreme Court declined Apple\u2019s bid (pdf<\/a>) for a hearing over two Qualcomm patents (US Patent No. 7,844,037 and US Patent No. 8,683,362) that were part of lawsuits filed in 2017, claiming infringement by Apple\u2019s iPhones, iPads, and Apple Watches<\/a>.<\/p>\n Reuters <\/em>points out<\/a> that Apple and Qualcomm\u2019s 2019 settlement of a worldwide legal battle over patents largely ended the squabbling<\/a> in favor of a six-year licensing agreement but allowed a case in front of the Patent and Trademark Office\u2019s Patent Trial and Appeal Board to continue. There, Apple argued the two patents should be invalid, but the board ruled in Qualcomm\u2019s favor. <\/p>\n Last April, the Federal Circuit court rejected Apple\u2019s request for an appeal based on the 2019 settlement covering thousands of patents, including those two. At the time, Apple argued that its royalty payments and risk of being sued again were reasons for a hearing. <\/p>\n
\n
<\/br><\/code><\/p>\n